amused themselves with theatrical representations
of the contest on the stage—the point of
their burlesques being the equality of age of the Father
and his Son” (Ibid, p. 53). Gibbon quotes
an amusing passage to show how widely spread was the
interest in the subject debated between the rival
parties: “This city is full of mechanics
and slaves, who are all of them profound theologians,
and preach in the shops and in the streets. If
you desire a man to change a piece of silver, he informs
you wherein the Son differs from the Father; if you
ask the price of a loaf, you are told, by way of reply,
that the Son is inferior to the Father; and if you
inquire whether the bath is ready, the answer is, that
the Son was made out of nothing” (Gibbon’s
“Decline and Fall,” vol. iii. p. 402).
Arius maintained that “the Logos was
a dependent and spontaneous production, created from
nothing by the will of the Father. The Son, by
whom all things were made, had been begotten before
all worlds, and the longest of the astronomical periods
could be compared only as a fleeting moment to the
extent of his duration; yet this duration was not infinite,
and there had been a time which preceded the
ineffable generation of the Logos....
He governed the universe in obedience to the will of
his Father and Monarch” (Ibid, pp. 18,19).
The “Nicene creed” of the Prayer-book
consists of the creed promulgated by the Council of
Nice, with the anathema at the end omitted, and with
the addition of some phrases joined to it at the Council
at Constantinople, and the insertion of the Filioque.
At the Council of Nice, Arius was condemned and banished,
to the triumph of his great opponent, Athanasius; but
he was recalled in A.D. 330, obtained the banishment
of Athanasius in A.D. 335, and died suddenly, under
very suspicious circumstances, in A.D. 336. Throughout
this century the struggle proceeded furiously, each
party in turn getting the upper hand, as the emperor
of the time inclined towards Catholicism or towards
Arianism, and each persecuting the adherents of the
other. Among Arian subdivisions we find Semi-Arians,
Eusebians, Aetians, Eunomians, Acasians, Psathyrians,
etc. Then we have the Apollinarians, who
maintained that Christ had no human soul, the divinity
supplying its place; the Marcellians, who taught that
a divine emanation descended on Christ. Allied
to the Manichaean heresy were the Priscillians, the
Saccophori, the Solitaries, and many others; and, in
addition, the Messalians or Euchites, the Luciferians,
the Origenists, the Antidicomarianites, and the Collyridians.
A quarrel about the consecration of a bishop gave
rise to fierce struggles not connected with the doctrine,
so much as with the discipline of the Church.
The Bishops of Numidia were angered by not having
been called to the consecration of Caecilianus Bishop
of Carthage, and, assembling together, they elected
and consecrated a rival bishop to that see, and declared
Caecilianus incompetent for the episcopal office.