travelled through the different provinces; and not
only sold, with most frontless impudence, their fictitious
relics, but also deceived the eyes of the multitude
with ludicrous combats with evil spirits or genii.
A whole volume would be requisite to contain an enumeration
of the various frauds which artful knaves practised,
with success, to delude the ignorant, when true religion
was almost entirely superseded by horrid superstition”
(p. 98). When to all these weapons we add the
forgeries everywhere circulated (see ante, pp. 240-243),
we can understand how rapidly Christianity spread,
and how “the faithful” were rendered pliable
to those whose interests lay in deceiving them.
During this century flourished some of the greatest
fathers of the Church, pre-eminent among whom we note
Ambrose, of Milan, Augustine, of Hippo, and the great
ecclesiastical doctor, Jerome. Already, in this
century, we find clear traces of the supremacy of
the bishop of Rome, and “when a new pontiff
was to be elected by the suffrages of the presbyters
and the people, the city of Rome was generally agitated
with dissensions, tumults, and cabals, whose consequences
were often deplorable and fatal” (p. 94).
By a decree of the Council of Constantinople, the bishop
of that city was given precedence next after the Roman
prelate, and the jealousy which arose between the
bishops of the two imperial cities fomented the disputes
which ended, finally, in the separation of the Eastern
and Western Churches. Of the officers of the Church
in this century we read that: “The bishops,
on the one hand, contended with each other, in the
most scandalous manner, concerning the extent of their
respective jurisdictions, while, on the other, they
trampled upon the rights of the people, violated the
privileges of the inferior ministers, and imitated,
in their conduct, and in their manner of living, the
arrogance, voluptuousness, and luxury of magistrates
and princes” (pp. 95, 96).
In this century is the first instance of the burning
alive of a heretic, and it was Spain who lighted that
first pile. Theodosius, of all the emperors of
this age, was the bitterest persecutor of the heretic
sects. “The orthodox emperor considered
every heretic as a rebel against the supreme powers
of heaven and of earth; and each of those powers might
exercise their peculiar jurisdiction over the soul
and body of the guilty.... In the space of fifteen
years [A.D. 380-394], he promulgated at least fifteen
severe edicts against the heretics; more especially
against those who rejected the doctrine of the Trinity;
and to deprive them of every hope of escape, he sternly
enacted, that if any laws or rescripts should be alleged
in their favour, the judges should consider them as
the illegal productions either of fraud or forgery....
The heretical teachers ... were exposed to the heavy
penalties of exile and confiscation, if they presumed
to preach the doctrine, or to practise the rites of
their accursed sects.... Their religious