the true essential, the insatiable realism of passion.
If any one wished to prove that Browning was not,
as he is said to be, the poet of thought, but pre-eminently
one of the poets of passion, we could scarcely find
a better evidence of this profoundly passionate element
than Browning’s astonishing realism in love poetry.
There is nothing so fiercely realistic as sentiment
and emotion. Thought and the intellect are content
to accept abstractions, summaries, and generalisations;
they are content that ten acres of ground should be
called for the sake of argument X, and ten widows’
incomes called for the sake of argument Y; they are
content that a thousand awful and mysterious disappearances
from the visible universe should be summed up as the
mortality of a district, or that ten thousand intoxications
of the soul should bear the general name of the instinct
of sex. Rationalism can live upon air and signs
and numbers. But sentiment must have reality;
emotion demands the real fields, the real widows’
homes, the real corpse, and the real woman. And
therefore Browning’s love poetry is the finest
love poetry in the world, because it does not talk
about raptures and ideals and gates of heaven, but
about window-panes and gloves and garden walls.
It does not deal much with abstractions; it is the
truest of all love poetry, because it does not speak
much about love. It awakens in every man the memories
of that immortal instant when common and dead things
had a meaning beyond the power of any dictionary to
utter, and a value beyond the power of any millionaire
to compute. He expresses the celestial time when
a man does not think about heaven, but about a parasol.
And therefore he is, first, the greatest of love poets,
and, secondly, the only optimistic philosopher except
Whitman.
The general accusation against Browning in connection
with his use of the grotesque comes in very definitely
here; for in using these homely and practical images,
these allusions, bordering on what many would call
the commonplace, he was indeed true to the actual and
abiding spirit of love. In that delightful poem
“Youth and Art” we have the singing girl
saying to her old lover—
“No harm! It was
not my fault
If you never turned
your eye’s tail up
As I shook upon E in alt,
Or ran the chromatic
scale up.”
This is a great deal more like the real chaff that
passes between those whose hearts are full of new
hope or of old memory than half the great poems of
the world. Browning never forgets the little details
which to a man who has ever really lived may suddenly
send an arrow through the heart. Take, for example,
such a matter as dress, as it is treated in “A
Lover’s Quarrel.”
“See, how she looks
now, dressed
In a sledging cap and vest!
’Tis
a huge fur cloak—
Like
a reindeer’s yoke
Falls the lappet along the
breast:
Sleeves for her arms to rest,
Or to hang, as my Love likes
best.”