I can tell you no more about politics than you may learn from the newspapers.  Peace, though much desired has caused no public excitement The truth is that just now we are not excitable.  As long as she remains in this condition France will not strike one of those blows by which she sometimes shakes Europe and overturns herself.

Reeve has been and Milnes still is here.  We have talked much of you with these two old friends.  Good bye, or rather, thank God, a bientot.

A thousand kind remembrances to Mrs. Senior.

A. DE TOCQUEVILLE.

[Footnote 1:  Mr. Senior was on his return from Egypt.—­ED.]

[Footnote 2:  The Ancien Regime.]

CONVERSATIONS.

Paris, May 16.—­M. de Tocqueville has scarcely been visible since my return to Paris.  Madame de Tocqueville has been absent.  She returned yesterday, and they spent this evening with us.

Tocqueville is full of his book, which is to appear in about a week.  His days and nights are devoted to correcting the press and to writing notes—­which he thought would be trifling, but which grow in length and importance.

The object of the work is to account for the rapid progress of the Revolution, to point out the principal causes which enabled a few comparatively obscure men to overthrow in six weeks a Monarchy of many centuries.

‘I am inclined,’ I said, ’to attribute the rapidity with which the old institutions of France fell, to the fact that there was no lex loci in France.  That the laws, or rather the customs, of the different provinces were dissimilar, and that nothing was defined.  That as soon as the foundations or the limits of any power were examined, it crumbled to pieces; so that the Assembly became omnipotent in the absence of any authority with ascertained rights and jurisdiction.’

‘There is much truth in that,’ answered Tocqueville, ’but there is also much truth in what looks like an opposite theory—­namely, that the Monarchy fell because its power was too extensive and too absolute.  Nothing is so favourable to revolution as centralisation, because whoever can seize the central point is obeyed down to the extremities.  Now the centralisation of France under the old Monarchy, though not so complete as its Democratic and Imperial tyrants afterwards made it, was great.  Power was concentrated in Paris and in the provincial capitals.  The smaller towns and the agricultural population were unorganised and defenceless.  The 14th of July revealed the terrible secret that the Master of Paris is the Master of France.’

Paris, May 18.—­I spent the day at Athy, the country-seat of M. Lafosse,[1] who had been my companion in our Egyptian journey.

‘What do you hear,’ I asked, ‘of the Empress?’

‘Nothing,’ he answered, ’but what is favourable; all her instincts and prejudices are good.  Lesseps, who is nearly related to her, has many of her letters, written during the courtship, in which she speaks of her dear Louis with the utmost affection, and dwells on the hope that if ever she should become his wife, she may be able to induce him to liberalise his Government.’