’Your unmeasured praise of Louis Napoleon and your unmeasured abuse of the Bourbons are, to a certain degree, the interference in our politics which you professedly disclaim.  I admit the anti-English prejudices of the Bourbons, and I admit that they are not likely to be abated by your alliance with a Bonaparte.  But the opinions of a constitutional sovereign do not, like those of a despot, decide the conduct of his country.  The country is anxious for peace, and, above all, peace with you—­for more than peace, for mutual good-feeling.  The Bourbons cannot return except with a constitution.  It has become the tradition of the family, it is their title to the throne.  There is not a vieille marquise in the Faubourg St.-Germain who believes in divine right.

’The higher classes in France are Bourbonists because they are Constitutionalists, because they believe that constitutional monarchy is the government best suited to France, and that the Bourbons offer us the fairest chance of it.

’Among the middle classes there is without doubt much inclination for the social equality of a Republic.  But they are alarmed at its instability; they have never known one live for more than a year or two, or die except in convulsions.

’As for the lower classes, the country people think little about politics, the sensible portion of the artizans care about nothing but cheap and regular work; the others are Socialists, and, next to the government of a Rouge Assembly, wish for that of a Rouge despot.’

‘In London,’ I said, ’a few weeks ago I came across a French Socialist, not indeed of the lower orders—­for he was a Professor of Mathematics—­but participating in their feelings.  “I prefer,” he said, “a Bonaparte to a Bourbon—­a Bonaparte must rely on the people, one can always get something out of him.”  “What have you got,” I asked, “from this man?” “A great deal,” he answered.  “We got the Orleans confiscation—­that was a great step. Il portait attente a la propriete.  Then he represents the power and majesty of the people.  He is like the people, above all law. Les Bourbons nous chicanaient."’

‘That was the true faith of a Rouge,’ said Tocqueville ‘If this man,’ he added, ’had any self-control, if he would allow us a very moderate degree of liberty, he might enjoy a reign—­probably found a dynasty.  He had everything in his favour; the prestige of his name, the acquiescence of Europe, the dread of the Socialists, and the contempt felt for the Republicans.  We were tired of Louis Philippe.  We remembered the branche ainee only to dislike it, and the Assembly only to despise it.  We never shall be loyal subjects, but we might have been discontented ones, with as much moderation as is in our nature.’

‘What is the nuance,’ I said, ‘of G——?’

‘G——­,’ answered Tocqueville, ’is an honest man, uncorrupt and public-spirited; he is a clear, logical, but bitter speaker; his words fall from the tribune like drops of gall.  He has great perspicacity, but rather a narrow range.  His vision is neither distant nor comprehensive.  He wears a pair of blinkers, which allow him to see only what he looks straight at—­and that is the English Constitution.  For what is to the right and to the left he has no eyes, and unhappily what is to the right and to the left is France.