sizes after it was laid in the ground at so much per
foot. This was the general practice by the
company as regards the piping. By reference
to the letter of March 7, it will be observed
that the answer to the tenth allegation explains why
the company could only sell the piping “subject
to whatever rights the city of St. Louis may be
entitled to in certain underground pipes, sewers,
and conduits in Forest Park.” It can be
stated that this complication of title to the piping
applied to two-thirds if not three-fourths of
all of the piping which had been laid at the expense
of the Exposition Company.
Because the copper wire was involved in the injunction proceedings, because the electric lights constituted a minor item as shown by the figures given above, because the piping was involved in the construction of the city ordinance, because the greater part of the fire apparatus was not owned by the Exposition Company these items were not mentioned in the original specifications.
As stated in the former letter,
the intramural cars and
equipments were excepted from
all offers of sale because the
company had already contracted
for the sale of them.
After the first bids received under the specifications referred to in the tenth allegation had been rejected because they were in the opinion of the salvage committee wholly insufficient, new bids were asked for all of the salvage of the company including such right and title as it might have in the copper wire, in the electric lights, in the iron piping, in the fire apparatus, etc., with the exceptions of the intramural cars and equipments and the property of the General Service Company. From that time to the acceptance of the proposition to sell the Chicago House Wrecking Company the negotiations proceeded on the plan that the Exposition Company would sell all right, title, and interest to its property with the exceptions of the cars and equipments and property of the General Service Company.
Under the original specifications a certified check for one-half of the amount of the bid was required and the terms were half cash, but this requirement and these terms did not enter into the negotiations following the rejection of the first bids. All bidders showing a disposition to bid for right, title, and interest of the Exposition Company to all salvage except as stated were treated alike. Certified checks were not required on these later bids. The negotiations were carried on verbally with the bidders in turn, it being understood that the company would insist upon what it deemed to be an adequate cash payment when the contract of sale was concluded.
The secretary of the company is authorized to say that the executive committee courts the fullest investigation of all circumstances connected with the sale of the salvage and that if the National Commission shall deem it necessary to include in its