of the price paid. As regards the iron piping,
bidders were informed of the clause in the ordinance
authorizing the use of Forest Park which declared
that “sewers, drains, conduits, pipes, and fixtures
shall become and be the property of the city.”
By reference to the contract of sale to the Chicago
House Wrecking Company it will be observed that
the company sells “subject to whatever rights
the city of St. Louis may be entitled to in certain
underground pipes, sewers, and conduits in Forest
Park.” Some of the fire apparatus was
loaned or rented to the Exposition Company, and
was not owned by it. Many things used by the
Exposition Company were sold to it with the privilege
of return, or with a contract to return at stipulated
amounts or percentages. The exposition officers
and the salvage committee answered inquiries,
as far as were in their power, made by bidders
regarding the property, but from first to last refused
to furnish an itemized list. By reference
to the contract of sale it will be observed that
no list is contained therein, but that the company
sells and transfers “the interest, or right,
or ownership in or to any and all physical property
purchased, constructed, or acquired by the said
Exposition Company, excepting as hereinafter mentioned.”
Eleventh. That according
to an estimate made by several
reputable contractors the
property sold was of the reasonable
value of $1,955,000.
Answer. The Exposition Company has no knowledge of such estimates. If contractors did place such estimates upon the value of the physical property they were singularly lacking in enterprise when they did not come forward with higher bids. The amount realized was the highest bid made for the property.
Twelfth. That the Chicago House Wrecking Company, through undue advantage, obtained inside information as to the extent and value of the property to be sold, and thereby to the material injury of the United States secured a contract with the Exposition Company insuring a profit of more than $1,000,000.
Answer. The Chicago House
Wrecking Company obtained no
information that was not accessible
to and obtainable by any
other bidder.
Very respectfully,
WALTER B. STEVENS,
Secretary.
Hon. THOMAS H. CARTER,
President National Commission,
Louisiana Purchase Exposition_.
ST. LOUIS, March 7, 1905.
MY DEAR SENATOR: I send herewith, by direction of the executive committee, a reply to the letter from the Commission of February 28. President Francis is absent from the city, having gone last week to New Orleans. I think I should add something from my personal knowledge. Mr. Richey is well known to me, and has been for years. He must have been badly misinformed to have made such allegations as are contained in the letter. I have all of the minutes of