“What are they talking about?” asked TIME, in guarded whisper, being, by this time, completely cowed.

“They haven’t reached public business yet,” I explained.  “Been for last two hours debating a private Bill, providing that the pump-handle in the village of Plumberry shall be chained at eight o’clock at night.  The Opposition want it done at nine.”

“Well, I suppose they know all about it,” said TIME.  “Probably been down to Plumberry, examined into bearing of whole question, and formed their opinion accordingly?”

“Nothing of the sort; some of them don’t even know where Plumberry is—­never heard its name before this Pump-handle business came up.  Don’t even now wait in House to hear question, debated by Members with local knowledge.  You see only twenty or thirty Members in their places.  But, when bell rings for division, four hundred will troop in, and their vote will settle the question whether Plumberry shall be privileged to pump water as late as nine o’clock, or whether at eight the handle shall be chained.”

So it turned out:  In House of four hundred and seventy-nine Members Bill was read a second time by majority of twenty-three.  Division occupied twenty minutes, which, with debate, appropriated two of the most precious hours of the sitting.

Mr. P. narrowly escaped expulsion, attention being awkwardly concentrated upon him, owing to the exuberance of his delight in recollection of how much better these things are managed at Westminster.

After this, public business was approached, beginning with questions.  Of these there were a list of eighty, the large majority on exceedingly trivial circumstances.  Nine-tenths of them could have been answered in a sentence by the Minister addressed, supposing the Member had dropped him a private note, or crossed the floor of the House, to speak to him.  TIME openly contemptuous at such a way of doing business, more especially when, on question which appeared on printed paper having been answered, half-a-dozen Members sprang up from different parts of House, and volleyed forth supplementary interrogations.  Explained to him things used to be worse when questions were propounded vivi voce, and at length.

“Now,” I said, not liking Mr. P.’s crowing over us, “the SPEAKER will not allow the terms of a question to be recited.  They appear on printed paper, and are taken as read.”

“Then,” queried TIME, “what are these Members putting questions ‘arising,’ they say, ’out of the answer just given?  They don’t spare a syllable, and take up five times as much of the Sitting as Members who put their questions on the Paper, and are not allowed to read them.  You don’t mean to say that such a transparent evasion of the rule is permitted?”

“It looks very like it,” said Mr. P.; “but it’s not at all the sort of thing that would be permitted in our House of Commons.  We make Rules, and the Speaker sees that they are obeyed in the spirit, as well as in the letter.”