her husband. But the
satti is now prohibited
by the English law, and the poor woman who loses her
husband is, according to custom, stripped of her clothing,
arrayed in coarse garments and doomed thenceforth to
perform the most menial offices of the family for
the remainder of her life, as one accursed beyond
redemption. To marry again is impossible:
the man who marries a widow suffers punishments which
no one who has not lived under the traditions of caste
can possibly comprehend. The wretched widow has
not even the consolations which come from books:
the decent Hindu woman does not know how to read or
write. There was still one avenue of escape from
this life. She might have become a
nautchni.
What wonder that there are so many of these? How,
then, to deal with this fatal superstition, or rather
conglomerate of superstitions, which seems to suffer
no more from attack than a shadow? We have begun
the revolution by marrying widows just as girls are
married, and by showing that the loss of caste—which
indeed we have quite abolished among ourselves—entails
necessarily none of those miserable consequences which
the priests have denounced; and we strike still more
deeply at the root of the trouble by instituting schools
where our own daughters, and all others whom we can
prevail upon to send, are educated with the utmost
care. In our religion we retain Brahma—by
whom we mean the one supreme God of all—and
abolish all notions of the saving efficacy of merely
ceremonial observances, holding that God has given
to man the choice of right and wrong, and the dignity
of exercising his powers in such accordance with his
convictions as shall secure his eternal happiness.
To these cardinal principles we subjoin the most unlimited
toleration for other religions, recognizing in its
fullest extent the law of the adaptation of the forms
of relief to the varying moulds of character resulting
from race, climate and all those great conditions of
existence which differentiate men one from another.”
[Illustration: CHARIOT OF THE PROCESSION OF THE
RATTJATTRA, AT JAGHERNATH.]
“How,” I asked, “do the efforts
of the Christian missionaries comport with your own
sect’s?”
“Substantially, we work together. With
the sincerest good wishes for their success—for
every sensible man must hail any influence which instills
a single new idea into the wretched Bengalee of low
condition—I am yet free to acknowledge that
I do not expect the missionaries to make many converts
satisfactory to themselves, for I am inclined to think
them not fully aware of the fact that in importing
Christianity among the Hindus they have not only brought
the doctrine, but they have brought the Western
form of it, and I fear that they do not recognize
how much of the nature of substance this matter of
form becomes when one is attempting to put new wine
into old bottles. Nevertheless, God speed them!
I say. We are all full of hope. Signs of