Her disclaimers were put down to her good-natured desire to screen Leam:  she had always been good to that extraordinary young person, they said.  But then Josephine Harrowby was good to every one, and if she had a fault it was the generalized character of her benevolence, which made her praise of no value, you see, because she praised every one alike, and took all that glittered for gold.  Hence, her assurances that Leam had really and truly put herself into (the appearance of) actual danger to save Fina from drowning, while she herself had done nothing more heroic than take the dripping pair of them home when all was over—­she forgot to add, sit in the carriage and scream—­went for nothing, and the popular delusion for all.  She was still the heroine of the day, and ipalmam qui non meruit_ the motto which the unconscious satirists bestowed on her.

She did not mean it to be so—­quite the contrary—­but wrong comes about from good intentions to the full as often as from evil ones.  Her design was simply to be truthful, as so much conscientious self-respect, in the first instance, and to do justice to Leam in the second; but between her good-natured advocacy and Adelaide’s undisguised hostility maybe the former did Leam the most harm.

The child’s past danger was quite sufficient reason why Josephine should come more frequently than usual to Ford House.  It was only natural that she should wish to know how the little one went on.  The cold, sore throat, rheumatic fever, measles that never came, might yet be always on the way, and the woman’s fond fears were only to be quieted by the comforting assurance of her daily observation.  Leam did get a cold, and a severe one, but then Leam was grown up and could take care of herself.  Fina was the natural charge of universal womanhood, and no one who was a woman at all could fail to be interested in such a pretty, caressing little creature.  And then Sebastian Dundas loved best the child which was not his own; and that, too, had its weight with Josephine, who somehow seemed to have forgotten by now that little Fina was madame’s child—­false and faithless madame—­and was not part and parcel of the man she loved, as also in some strange sense her own.  Madame’s initial dedication had touched her deeply both at the time and ever after; the likeness of name was again another tie; and that subtle resemblance to herself which every one saw and spoke of seemed to round off all into an harmonious whole, and give her a right which even Mrs. Birkett did not possess.

It was about a week after the accident when Josephine went one morning, as usual, to ask after Fina, and be convinced by personal inspection that the pretty little featherhead, the child of many loves, was well.  She was met in the drawing-room by Mr. Dundas, who when he greeted her took both her hands in his in a more effusive manner than he had ever permitted himself to show since Pepita’s death, save once before he had decided on madame and when Josephine had one day touched an old chord tenderly.