the faith to ignore the opposition of all the world’s
wisdom and of all its enthroned power, and to fulfil
his task as the woman does who hides her leaven in
the meal, content to wait for years, or millenniums,
until his truth shall conquer in the realization of
God’s will on earth even as it is done in heaven.
It confronts us when we consider that the Man who has
shown his brethren what obedience means, who has taught
them to pray, who has been for all these centuries
the Way, the Truth, the Life, by whom they come to
God, habitually claimed without shadow of abashment
or slightest hint of conscious presumption, a nature,
a relation to God, a freedom from sin, that other
men according to the measure of their godliness would
shun as blasphemy. If the personal claim was true,
and not the blind pretence of vanity, the Jesus of
the gospels is the exception to the uniform fact of
human nature, but he is no longer unaccountable; and
if his claim was true, his knowledge of the absolute
religion, and his choice of the irresistible propaganda,
are no less extraordinary, but they are not unaccountable.
Paul, whose life was transformed and his thinking
revolutionized by his meeting with the risen Jesus,
thought on these things and believed that “the
name which, is above every name” was his by
right of nature as well as by the reward of obedience
(Phil. ii. 5-11). John, who leaned on Jesus’
breast during his earthly life, and who meditated
on the meaning of that life through a ministry of many
decades, came to believe that he whom he had seen
with his eyes, heard with his ears, handled with his
hands, was, indeed, “the Word made flesh”
(John i. 14), through whom the very God revealed his
love to men. Through all the perplexities of
doubt, amidst all the obscurings of irrelevant speculations,
the hearts of men to-day turn to this Jesus of Nazareth
as their supreme revelation of God, and find in him
“the Master of their thinking and the Lord of
their lives.”
“Lord, to whom shall we go? Thou hast the
words of eternal life. And we have believed and
know that thou art the Holy One of God.”
Appendix
Books of Reference on the Life of Jesus
1. A concise account of the voluminous literature
on this subject maybe found at the close of the article
JESUS CHRIST by Zockler in Schaff-Herzog, Encyclopedia
of Religious Knowledge. Of the earlier of
the modern works it is well to mention David Friedrich
Strauss, Das Leben Jesu (2 vols. 1835), in
which he sought to reduce all the gospel miracles
to myths. August Neander, Das Leben Jesu Christi,
1837, wrote in opposition to the attitude taken by
Strauss. Both of these works have been translated
into English. Ernst Renan, Vie de Jesus
(1863, 16th ed. 1879), translated, The Life of
Jesus (1863), is a charming, though often superficial
and patronizing, presentation of the subject.
For vivid word pictures of scenes in the life of Jesus