Al Tur, they took some vessels belonging to
the enemy. At first the Turks opposed their landing;
but some of them being slain, the rest abandoned the
city, in which nothing was found of value. De
Gama did not burn this town, in reverence for the
relics of St Catharine and the monastery and religious
men there, which he visited at their request.
He was the first European commander who had taken
that city, where he knighted several of his followers,
an honour much prized by those who received it, and
which was envied; afterwards even by the emperor Charles
V. From thence De Gama proceeded to Suez; and after
many brave but fruitless attempts to sound the harbour,
De Gama determined to go himself in open day to view
the gallies. He accordingly landed and saw the
enemies but endeavouring to force his way towards
them, the enemies shot poured thick from the town,
and 2000 Turkish horse broke out from an ambush, by
which the Portuguese were reduced to great straits.
Though the Portuguese cannon slew a good many of the
enemy, their numbers were so much superior that the
Portuguese were obliged to retreat with some loss,
and much grieved that the object of their expedition
was frustrated. Thus far we have deemed necessary
to premise, relative to the design and success of
the expedition, from De Faria and other authors; because
the journal of Don Juan de Castro is almost entirely
confined to observations respecting the places visited
in the voyage, and gives little or no information respecting
these particulars.
The rutter or journal must be allowed to be
very curious.—The author, like an exact
and diligent navigator, has not only given the course
and distance from one place to another, with the latitudes
of the principal ports and head-lands; but has noticed
the minute windings of the coast, and the situations
of islands, with observations on the tides, currents,
shoals, sand-banks, and other particulars respecting
the Red Sea. Yet, far from confining himself
to mere nautical remarks, he has given an account
of all the places at which he touched, together with
accounts of the countries and the inhabitants, so
far as he was able to collect from his own observations,
or the accounts of such as he was able to converse
with, particularly the natives. Don John hath
gone farther yet, and has even attempted to draw a
parallel between the ancient and modern geography
of this sea. If in all points of this last he
may not have succeeded, the great difficulty of the
task, owing to the obscurity of the subject, is to
be considered: most of the ancient places having
been destroyed; the ancient names of others long since
out of use and forgotten; and that very little is
known of these coasts by Europeans, even at this day.
For these reasons, as the conjectures of the author
are often erroneous respecting the ancient geography,
and as at best they are very uncertain, we shall for
the most part insert them by way of notes,
with our own remarks respecting them[256]. Whether