Johnson the author is not always fairly treated.  Phrases are convenient things to hand about, and it is as little the custom to inquire into their truth as it is to read the letterpress on bank-notes.  We are content to count bank-notes and to repeat phrases.  One of these phrases is, that whilst everybody reads Boswell, nobody reads Johnson.  The facts are otherwise.  Everybody does not read Boswell, and a great many people do read Johnson.  If it be asked, What do the general public know of Johnson’s nine volumes octavo?  I reply, Beshrew the general public!  What in the name of the Bodleian has the general public got to do with literature?  The general public subscribes to Mudie, and has its intellectual, like its lacteal sustenance, sent round to it in carts.  On Saturdays these carts, laden with “recent works in circulation,” traverse the Uxbridge Road; on Wednesdays they toil up Highgate Hill, and if we may believe the reports of travelers, are occasionally seen rushing through the wilds of Camberwell and bumping over Blackheath.  It is not a question of the general public, but of the lover of letters.  Do Mr. Browning, Mr. Arnold, Mr. Lowell, Mr. Trevelyan, Mr. Stephen, Mr. Morley, know their Johnson?  “To doubt would be disloyalty.”  And what these big men know in their big way, hundreds of little men know in their little way.  We have no writer with a more genuine literary flavor about him than the great Cham of literature.  No man of letters loved letters better than he.  He knew literature in all its branches—­he had read books, he had written books, he had sold books, he had bought books, and he had borrowed them.  Sluggish and inert in all other directions, he pranced through libraries.  He loved a catalogue; he delighted in an index.  He was, to employ a happy phrase of Dr. Holmes, at home amongst books as a stable-boy is amongst horses.  He cared intensely about the future of literature and the fate of literary men.  “I respect Millar,” he once exclaimed; “he has raised the price of literature.”  Now Millar was a Scotchman.  Even Horne Tooke was not to stand in the pillory:  “No, no, the dog has too much literature for that.”  The only time the author of ‘Rasselas’ met the author of the ‘Wealth of Nations’ witnessed a painful scene.  The English moralist gave the Scotch one the lie direct, and the Scotch moralist applied to the English one a phrase which would have done discredit to the lips of a costermonger; but this notwithstanding, when Boswell reported that Adam Smith preferred rhyme to blank verse, Johnson hailed the news as enthusiastically as did Cedric the Saxon the English origin of the bravest knights in the retinue of the Norman king.  “Did Adam say that?” he shouted:  “I love him for it.  I could hug him!” Johnson no doubt honestly believed he held George III. in reverence, but really he did not care a pin’s fee for all the crowned heads of Europe.  All his reverence was reserved for “poor scholars.”  When a small boy in a wherry, on whom had devolved the arduous task of rowing Johnson and his biographer across the Thames, said he would give all he had to know about the Argonauts, the Doctor was much pleased, and gave him, or got Boswell to give him, a double fare.  He was ever an advocate of the spread of knowledge amongst all classes and both sexes.  His devotion to letters has received its fitting reward, the love and respect of all “lettered hearts.”