Now, the Dunfermline Report is an admirable example of art thus allied with science for social service.  It is an ideal picture, strictly adherent to local colour and conditions, of an ancient city prolonging its vitality into the present and future by providing a very high form of training for its citizens, a training not of intellect only, but of the senses, of manual dexterity, of imagination, of Republican sympathy—­a training in which “laborious inacquaintance with dead languages,” infusing into the few touched by it a tincture of caste and militarism, gives way to comprehensive study of the evolution of Man, preparing the whole, and not a section merely, of the new generation for social service.

Such a Utopia as this may be looked upon as fulfilling the true social function of Art; standing midway between theory and practice; inspired by thought, and stimulating action.  Only the social artist has to look to it that his thoughts be not merely true but adequate, lest he degenerate into a mere decorator.  How far will a series of “regional surveys,” like those of [Page:  143] Mr. Booth in London and Mr. Rowntree in York, carry us!  Not so far, I fear, as Professor Geddes seems to hope.  Cities in our modern life are organs inseparable from a larger whole, the nation; and before the life of cities can be much changed, we have to ask ourselves, What is the national life?  What is its ethical and religious standard?  What is its practice as to the acquisition and distribution of wealth?  And, again, What is to be the intercourse of nations?  Is it to be war or peace?

Mr. Carnegie has given half a million for the benefit of a town of 30,000 inhabitants.  Magnificent as the donation is, it is not too much; not nearly enough, indeed, for the full realisation of Professor Geddes’ scheme.  Still, wisely used, it might accomplish great results.  What we have recently sunk in the work of suppressing two free States in South Africa would have made it possible to do for three hundred towns what has been done for Dunfermline.  Half of what we are now spending on our army and navy would enable us to endow thirty more of such towns annually.

Mr. ISRAEL ZANGWILL in To-day (Aug. 10, 1904), said:  The Sociological Society is forging ahead at American speed; the professors jostle one another, and Geddes treads on the heels of Galton.  After “Eugenics,” or the Science of Good Births, comes “Civics,” or the Science of Cities.  In the former Mr. Galton was developing an idea which was in the air, and in Wells.  In the latter Professor Geddes has struck out a more novel line, and a still more novel nomenclature.  Politography, Politogenics, and Eu-Politogenics, likewise Hebraomorphic and Latinomorphic and Eutopia—­quite an opposite idea from Utopia—­such are some of the additions to the dictionary which the science of Civics carries in its train.  They are all excellent words—­with the double-barrelled exception—­and still