for my native town of Dunfermline. My friend Mr.
Carnegie, whose native town it also is, I believe intends
to show by an object lesson what can be done for all
cities. Prof. Geddes is helping him in this
work with his suggestions. I hope they will be
carried out. In America there are several very
beautiful cities. No one can ever forget Washington,
which is truly a garden city. No money is spared
in America to beautify and healthify (excuse the barbarism)
the habitations of the thousands. A beautiful
city is an investment for health, intellect, imagination.
Genius all the world over is associated, wherever
it has been connected with cities, with beautiful cities.
To grow up among things of beauty ennobles the population.
But I should like to see Prof. Geddes extend
his projects for Dunfermline to the population itself.
Most of you know what Mr. Henderson did to utilise
the Edinburgh [Page: 125] police in the care of
children. The future of the country depends upon
them. The subject is too serious to continue to
be left to the haphazard mercies of indifferent parents.
Every child born is an agent for good or for evil
among the community, and the community cannot afford
to neglect how it is brought up, the circumstances
in which it has its being, the environment from which
it derives its character and tendencies. Necessity
may be the mother of invention, but need of food and
insufficient clothing develop in the child an inventiveness
that is not for the good of the community. It
seems a matter of too great an importance to be left
even to private initiative, as was done under Mr.
Henderson’s regime in Edinburgh; but everywhere
else, or nearly so, very little is done by even private
initiative for the protection of the children against
their vicious environment. In short, I do not
think that civics, in the sense in which my friend
Prof. Geddes treats it, is a complete subject
at all. Civics, to my mind, includes everything
that relates to the citizen. Everywhere something
is being done in one direction or another to make them
capable, prosperous, and happy. In America happiness
is taught in the schools. Every schoolmaster’s
and schoolmistress’s first duty is to set an
example of a happy frame of mind; smiling and laughing
are encouraged, and it is not thought that the glum
face is at all necessary for the serious business
of life. In fact, the glum face is a disqualification;
is associated with failure, and bad luck and ill-nature.
In Germany the schoolmaster is in the first place a
trainer of the body. One of his chief duties
is to watch and prevent the deterioration of the eyesight,
to promote the development of the lungs, to prevent
spinal deviation. The second part of his business
is to watch over the character of the child, and only
the third part is to ram knowledge into the poor little
mind. And wherever you go over the world you
will find something in the course of being done in
civics, as I understand the subject. I thank
Prof. Geddes for what he is doing for Dunfermline,
and hope he will understand “progress”
without requiring to define it.