of it? But with such mock acknowledgements (of
which a variety of other instances might be given)
have they hitherto imposed on the generation.
And so, 5. It is a prayer, that in several parts
thereof, has no scripture warrant, no foundation in
the promises of God. Particularly, on what scriptural
warrant, what promise, can
Seceders build their
prayers for, or expectation of the Lord’s answering
them, by blessing an Erastian government to themselves
or others, which being, in its constitution, contrary
to the word of God,—is such, that under
it (as they grant,
ibid, page 46), a people
cannot truly prosper in their civil concerns, nor be
enriched with the blessings of the gospel? From
what scriptural promise are they warranted to pray,
that God may perpetuate the succession to the throne
in any one family, and especially, when that succession
is circumscribed and limited, in a way opposite to
the laws of God, and mediatory kingdom of Christ?
and therefore, a prayer that cannot be made in faith,
and so cannot be acceptable to God in its complex
form. No person can have faith in the merit and
intercession of Christ, for obtaining anything in
prayer, but what Christ has priorly merited, and does
actually intercede for. But it would savor too
much of blasphemy, to apply some of the particulars
already noticed in this form of prayer, to the merit
and intercession of our
great High-priest.
Sure it cannot be thought, that he makes intercession
for the prosperity and success of his enemies, in
their stated opposition to his kingdom and interest
in this world; neither can it be consistent with fidelity
to Christ, as a King, for his professed subjects to
pray for it. What a fearful trifling with God
in the duty of prayer, is it to pray that the Lord
may bring down Popery and Prelacy; and next breath
to pray that the Lord may continue, prosper, and preserve
the Erastian head, and great bulwark of Prelacy?
4. Again, the Presbytery testify against the
Associate party for their treachery in covenant.
This is a sin that is in scripture, and even by the
common voice of mankind, declared very heinous; but
which, by what is already discovered anent said party,
appears too, too justly chargeable upon them.
It is notorious, and what themselves boast much of,
that they professedly maintain the moral and perpetual
obligation of the covenants, both the National Covenant
of Scotland, and the Solemn League and Covenant
of Scotland, England, and Ireland, entered
into for reformation and defense of religion, and
bringing the churches of God in the three kingdoms
to the nearest conjunction and uniformity in religion,
according to the word of God. They also do in
the most public manner profess, that they are the
only true faithful witnesses for a covenanted reformation.
But the consistency of such a profession with maintaining
principles that are diametrically opposite to these
covenants, and the cause of truth, sworn to in them