But it is now time to sound a retreat; and to desire to be excused of this long pursuit:  and withal, that the good intent, which hath moved me to draw the picture of time past (which we call History) in so large a table, may also be accepted in place of a better reason.

The examples of divine providence, everywhere found (the first divine histories being nothing else but a continuation of such examples) have persuaded me to fetch my beginning from the beginning of all things:  to wit, Creation.  For though these two glorious actions of the Almighty be so near, and (as it were) linked together, that the one necessarily implieth the other:  Creation inferring Providence (for what father forsaketh the child that he hath begotten?) and Providence pre-supposing Creation:  yet many of those that have seemed to excel in worldly wisdom, have gone about to disjoin this coherence; the epicure denying both Creation and Providence, but granting the world had a beginning; the Aristotelian granting Providence, but denying both the creation and the beginning.

Now although this doctrine of faith, touching the creation in time (for by faith we understand, that the world was made by the word of God), be too weighty a work for Aristotle’s rotten ground to bear up, upon which he hath (notwithstanding) founded the defences and fortresses of all his verbal doctrine:  yet that the necessity of infinite power, and the world’s beginning, and the impossibility of the contrary even in the judgment of natural reason, wherein he believed, had not better informed him; it is greatly to be marvelled at.  And it is no less strange, that those men which are desirous of knowledge (seeing Aristotle hath failed in this main point; and taught little other than terms in the rest) have so retrenched their minds from the following and overtaking of truth, and so absolutely subjected themselves to the law of those philosophical principles; as all contrary kind of teaching, in the search of causes, they have condemned either for phantastical, or curious.  Both doth it follow, that the positions of heathen philosophers are undoubted grounds and principles indeed, because so called?  Or that ipsi dixerunt, doth make them to be such?  Certainly no.  But this is true, that where natural reason hath built anything so strong against itself, as the same reason can hardly assail it, much less batter it down:  the same in every question of nature, and infinite power, may be approved for a fundamental law of human knowledge.  For saith Charron in his book of wisdom, “Toute proposition humaine a autant d’authorite quel’autre, si la raison n’on fait la difference;” “Every human proposition hath equal authority, if reason make not the difference,” the rest being but the fables of principles.  But hereof how shall the upright and impartial judgment of man give a sentence, where opposition and examination are not admitted to give in evidence?  And to this purpose it was well said of Lactantius, “Sapientiam