itself in the breast of the artist or writer; the
choice of words, the length or shortness of the period,
the species of metaphor, the accent of a verse, the
chain of reasoning—all are to him an indication;
while his eyes are reading the text his mind and soul
are following the steady flow and ever-changing series
of emotions and conceptions from which this text has
issued; he is working out its psychology.
Should you desire to study this operation, regard
the promoter and model of all the high culture of
the epoch, Goethe, who, before composing his “Iphigenia”
spent days in making drawings of the most perfect statues
and who, at last, his eyes filled with the noble forms
of antique scenery and his mind penetrated by the
harmonious beauty of antique life, succeeded in reproducing
internally, with such exactness, the habits and yearnings
of Greek imagination as to provide us with an almost
twin sister of the “Antigone” of Sophocles
and of the goddesses of Phidias. This exact and
demonstrated divination of bygone sentiments has, in
our days, given a new life to history. There
was almost complete ignorance of this in the last
century; men of every race and of every epoch were
represented as about alike, the Greek, the barbarian,
the Hindoo, the man of the Renaissance and the man
of the eighteenth century, cast in the same mold and
after the same pattern, and after a certain abstract
conception which served for the whole human species.
There was a knowledge of man but not of men.
There was no penetration into the soul itself; nothing
of the infinite diversity and wonderful complexity
of souls had been detected; it was not known that the
moral organization of a people or of an age is as
special and distinct as the physical structure of
a family of plants or of an order of animals.
History to-day, like zooelogy, has found its anatomy,
and whatever branch of it is studied, whether philology,
languages or mythologies, it is in this way that labor
must be given to make it produce new fruit. Among
so many writers who, since Herder, Ottfried Mueller,
and Goethe have steadily followed and rectified this
great effort, let the reader take two historians and
two works, one “The Life and Letters of Cromwell”
by Carlyle, and the other the “Port Royal”
of Sainte-Beuve. He will see how precisely, how
clearly, and how profoundly we detect the soul of
a man beneath his actions and works; how, under an
old general and in place of an ambitious man vulgarly
hypocritical, we find one tormented by the disordered
reveries of a gloomy imagination, but practical in
instinct and faculties, thoroughly English and strange
and incomprehensible to whoever has not studied the
climate and the race; how, with about a hundred scattered
letters and a dozen or more mutilated speeches, we
follow him from his farm and his team to his general’s
tent and to his Protector’s throne, in his transformation
and in his development, in his struggles of conscience
and in his statesman’s resolutions, in such