At bottom mythologies and languages are not existences;
the only realities are human beings who have employed
words and imagery adapted to their organs and to suit
the original cast of their intellects. A creed
is nothing in itself. Who made it? Look at
this or that portrait of the sixteenth century, the
stern, energetic features of an archbishop or of an
English martyr. Nothing exists except through
the individual; it is necessary to know the individual
himself. Let the parentage of creeds be established,
or the classification of poems, or the growth of constitutions,
or the transformations of idioms, and we have only
cleared the ground. True history begins when the
historian has discerned beyond the mists of ages the
living, active man, endowed with passions, furnished
with habits, special in voice, feature, gesture and
costume, distinctive and complete, like anybody that
you have just encountered in the street. Let
us strive then, as far as possible, to get rid of
this great interval of time which prevents us from
observing the man with our eyes,
the eyes of our
own head. What revelations do we find in
the calendared leaves of a modern poem? A modern
poet, a man like De Musset, Victor Hugo, Lamartine,
or Heine, graduated from a college and traveled, wearing
a dress-coat and gloves, favored by ladies, bowing
fifty times and uttering a dozen witticisms in an
evening, reading daily newspapers, generally occupying
an apartment on the second story, not over-cheerful
on account of his nerves, and especially because,
in this dense democracy in which we stifle each other,
the discredit of official rank exaggerates his pretensions
by raising his importance, and, owing to the delicacy
of his personal sensations, leading him to regard himself
as a Deity. Such is what we detect behind modern
meditations and
sonnets.
Again, behind a tragedy of the seventeenth century
there is a poet, one, for example, like Racine, refined,
discreet, a courtier, a fine talker, with majestic
perruque and ribboned shoes, a monarchist and zealous
Christian, “God having given him the grace not
to blush in any society on account of zeal for his
king or for the Gospel,” clever in interesting
the monarch, translating into proper French “the
gaulois of Amyot,” deferential to the
great, always knowing how to keep his place in their
company, assiduous and respectful at Marly as at Versailles,
amid the formal creations of a decorative landscape
and the reverential bows, graces, intrigues, and fineness
of the braided seigniors Who get up early every morning
to obtain the reversion of an office, together with
the charming ladies who count on their fingers the
pedigrees which entitle them to a seat on a footstool.
On this point consult Saint-Simon and the engravings
of Perelle, the same as you have just consulted Balzac
and the water-color drawings of Eugene Lami.