first be taught to describe these accurately, before
he enters upon geometry; then it shows how by these
operations problems may be solved. To describe
right lines and circles are problems, but not geometrical
problems. The solution of these problems is required
from mechanics; and by geometry the use of them, when
so solved, is shown; and it is the glory of geometry
that from those few principles, fetched from without,
it is able to produce so many things. Therefore
geometry is founded in mechanical practice, and is
nothing but that part of universal mechanics which
accurately proposes and demonstrates the art of measuring.
But since the manual arts are chiefly conversant in
the moving of bodies, it comes to pass that geometry
is commonly referred to their magnitudes, and mechanics
to their motion. In this sense rational mechanics
will be the science of motions resulting from any
forces whatsoever, and of the forces required to produce
any motions, accurately proposed and demonstrated.
This part of mechanics was cultivated by the ancients
in the five powers which relate to manual arts, who
considered gravity (it not being a manual power) no
otherwise than as it moved weights by those powers.
Our design, not respecting arts, but philosophy, and
our subject, not manual, but natural powers, we consider
chiefly those things which relate to gravity, levity,
elastic force, the resistance of fluids, and the like
forces, whether attractive or impulsive; and therefore
we offer this work as mathematical principles of philosophy;
for all the difficulty of philosophy seems to consist
in this—from the phenomena of motions to
investigate the forces of nature, and then from these
forces to demonstrate the other phenomena; and to
this end the general propositions in the first and
second book are directed. In the third book we
give an example of this in the explication of the system
of the World; for by the propositions mathematically
demonstrated in the first book, we there derive from
the celestial phenomena the forces of gravity with
which bodies tend to the sun and the several planets.
Then, from these forces, by other propositions which
are also mathematical, we deduce the motions of the
planets, the comets, the moon, and the sea. I
wish we could derive the rest of the phenomena of
nature by the same kind of reasoning from mechanical
principles; for I am induced by many reasons to suspect
that they may all depend upon certain forces by which
the particles of bodies, by some causes hitherto unknown,
are either mutually impelled towards each other, and
cohere in regular figures, or are repelled and recede
from each other; which forces being unknown, philosophers
have hitherto attempted the search of nature in vain;
but I hope the principles here laid down will afford
some light either to that or some truer method of
philosophy.