and discovering the most destructive designs against our Church and State, instead of thanking fortune that they are got off safe in their persons and plunder, should hire these bullies of the pen to defend their reputations?  I remember I thought it the hardest case in the world, when a poor acquaintance of mine, having fallen among sharpers, where he lost all his money, and then complaining he was cheated, got a good beating into the bargain, for offering to affront gentlemen.  I believe the only reason why these purloiners of the public, cause such a clutter to be made about their reputations, is to prevent inquisitions, that might tend towards making them refund:  like those women they call shoplifters, who when they are challenged for their thefts, appear to be mighty angry and affronted, for fear of being searched.

I will dismiss you, Sir, when I have taken notice of one particular.  Perhaps you may have observed in the tolerated factious papers of the week, that the E[arl] of R[ochester][13] is frequently reflected on for having been ecclesiastical commissioner and lord treasurer, in the reign of the late King James.  The fact is true; and it will not be denied to his immortal honour, that because he could not comply with the measures then taking, he resigned both those employments; of which the latter was immediately supplied by a commission, composed of two popish lords and the present E[ar]l of G[o]d[o]l[phi]n.[14]

[Footnote 1:  No. 28 in the reprint. [T.S.]]

[Footnote 2:  Horace, “Epodes,” xvii. 56.

  “Safely shalt thou Cotytto’s rites
    Divulge?”—­J.  DUNCOMBE.

   [T.S.]]

[Footnote 3:  “A Letter to the Examiner.  Printed in the year, 1710,” appeared shortly after the issue of the second number of “The Examiner.”  It was attributed to St. John. [T.S.]]

[Footnote 4:  The writer of the “Letter” invited the “Examiner” to “paint ... the present state of the war abroad, and expose to public view those principles upon which, of late, it has been carried on ...  Collect some few of the indignities which have been this year offered to her Majesty....  When this is done, D——­n shall blush in his grave among the dead, W——­le among the living, and even Vol——­e shall feel some remorse.” [T.S.]]

[Footnote 5:  “The Medley” treated “The Examiner” with scant courtesy, and never failed to cast ridicule on its work.  In No. 21 (February 19th, 1711) the writer says:  “No man of common sense ever thought any body wrote the paper but Abel Roper, or some of his allies, there being not one quality in ‘The Examiner’ which Abel has not eminently distinguished himself by since he set up for a political writer.  ’Tis true, Abel is the more modest of the two, and it never entered into his head to say, as my friend does of his paper, ’Tis writ with plain sense and in a tolerable style.’” In No. 23 (March 5th) he says:  “There is indeed a great resemblance between his brother Abel and himself; and I find a great dispute among the party, to which of them to give the preference.  They are both news writers, as they utter things which no body ever heard of but from their papers.”