But though I have never heard, or never regarded any objections made against that paper, which mentions the army; yet I intended this as a sort of apology for it.  And first, I declare, (because we live in a mistaking world) that in hinting at some proceedings, wherein a few persons are said to be concerned, I did not intend to charge them upon the body of the army.  I have too much detested that barbarous injustice among the writers of a late party, to be ever guilty of it myself; I mean the accusing societies for the crimes of a few.  On the other side, I must take leave to believe, that armies are no more exempt from corruptions than other numbers of men.  The maxims proposed were occasionally introduced by the report of certain facts, which I am bound to believe is true, because I am sure, considering what has passed, it would be a crime to think otherwise.  All posts in the army, all employments at court, and many others, are (or ought to be) given and resumed at the mere pleasure of the prince; yet when I see a great officer broke, a change made in the court or the ministry, and this under the most just and gracious Princess that ever reigned, I must naturally conclude it is done upon prudent considerations, and for some great demerit in the sufferers.  But then; is not the punishment sufficient?  Is it generous or charitable to trample on the unfortunate, and expose their faults to the world in the strongest colours?  And would it not suit better with magnanimity as well as common good-nature, to leave them at quiet to their own thoughts and repentance?  Yes without question, provided it could be so contrived that their very names, as well as actions, might be forgotten for ever; such an act of oblivion would be for the honour of our nation, and beget a better opinion of us with posterity; and then I might have spared the world and myself the trouble of examining.  But at present, there is a cruel dilemma in the case:  The friends and abettors of the late ministry are every day publishing their praises to the world, and casting reflections upon the present persons in power.  This is so barefaced an aspersion upon the Q[ueen], that I know not how any good subject can with patience endure it, though he were ever so indifferent with regard to the opinions in dispute.  Shall they who have lost all power and love of the people, be allowed to scatter their poison; and shall not those, who are, at least, of the strongest side, be suffered to bring an antidote?  And how can we undeceive the deluded remainder, but by letting them see, that those discarded statesmen were justly laid aside, and producing as many instances to prove it as we can? not from any personal hatred to them, but in justification to the best of queens.  The many scurrilities I have heard and read against this poor paper of mine, are in such a strain, that considering the present state of affairs, they look like a jest.  They usually run after the following manner:  “What? shall