I am ashamed to say, England strove to obtain the pre-eminence amongst European nations and which she forced upon her colonies against their will.  Yet I should regret it deeply if that were the one passage of history selected for study in the schools and colleges for coloured pupils in the West Indies at the present day.  When a man who has suffered wrong in former years broods over it instead of thinking of his present blessings and his future prospects, one may be sure that he is a man who will not succeed in life; and what is true of individuals is true also of nations.

The expression “Protestant ascendancy,” although it never came into use during the period with which we are dealing, has so frequently since then been employed with reference to it, that it is necessary to explain its meaning.  Probably no word in the English language has suffered more from being used in different senses than the word “Protestant.”  In Ireland it frequently used to be, and still sometimes is, taken as equivalent to “Anglican” or “Episcopalian”; to an Irishman of the last century it would have appeared quite natural to speak of “Protestants and Presbyterians,” meaning thereby two distinct bodies.  This is a matter of historical importance; for so far from the Presbyterian element being favoured during the period of the Penal Laws, the English Toleration Act had not been extended to Ireland; Presbyterians were by the sacramental test excluded from all municipal offices; their worship, though never in practice interfered with, remained technically illegal.  Their share in “Protestant ascendancy” was therefore very limited.

But if the Established Church was the one favoured body, it had to pay dearly for its privileges.  In truth, the state of the Irish Church at this period of its history, was deplorable.  All the positions of value—­bishoprics, deaneries and important parishes—­were conferred on Englishmen, who never resided in their cures, but left the duties either to be performed by half-starved deputies or not at all.  Many of the churches were in ruins, and the glebes had fallen into decay; a union of half-a-dozen parishes would scarcely supply a meagre salary for one incumbent.  A large proportion of the tithes had been appropriated by laymen; how small a sum actually reached the clergy is shown by the fact that the first-fruits (that is, the year’s income paid by incumbents on their appointment) did not amount to more than L500 a year in all.  It may be that the standard of religious life was not lower in Ireland than it was in England when the spiritually-minded non-Jurors had been driven out and Hanoverian deadness was supreme; but in England there was no other Church to form a contrast.  In Ireland the apathy and worldliness of the Protestant clergy stood out in bold relief against the heroic devotion of the priests and friars; and at the time when the unhappy peasants, forced to pay tithes to a Church which they detested, were ready to starve themselves to support their own clergy and to further the cause of their religion, the well-to-do Protestant graziers and farmers were straining the law so as to evade the payment of tithes, and never thought of doing anything further to support the Church to which they were supposed to belong. (It is but fair, however, to state that this condition of things has long since passed away; the Evangelical revival breathed new life into the dry bones of Irish Protestantism.)