But another man, who has devoted a great deal of time
and attention to the subject, and availed himself
of the most powerful telescopes and the results of
the observations of others, declares that in his opinion
it is probably composed of materials very similar to
those of which our own earth is made up: and that
is also only an hypothesis. But I need not tell
you that there is an enormous difference in the value
of the two hypotheses. That one which is based
on sound scientific knowledge is sure to have a corresponding
value; and that which is a mere hasty random guess
is likely to have but little value. Every great
step in our progress in discovering causes has been
made in exactly the same way as that which I have
detailed to you. A person observing the occurrence
of certain facts and phenomena asks, naturally enough,
what process, what kind of operation known to occur
in Nature applied to the particular case, will unravel
and explain the mystery? Hence you have the scientific
hypothesis; and its value will be proportionate to
the care and completeness with which its basis had
been tested and verified. It is in these matters
as in the commonest affairs of practical life:
the guess of the fool will be folly, while the guess
of the wise man will contain wisdom. In all cases,
you see that the value of the result depends on the
patience and faithfulness with which the investigator
applies to his hypothesis every possible kind of verification.
ON THE PHYSICAL BASIS OF LIFE [92]
In order to make the title of this discourse generally
intelligible, I have translated the term “Protoplasm,”
which is the scientific name of the substance of which
I am about to speak, by the words “the physical
basis of life.” I suppose that, to many,
the idea that there is such a thing as a physical
basis, or matter, of life may be novel—so
widely spread is the conception of life as a something
which works through matter, but is independent of
it; and even those who are aware that matter and life
are inseparably connected, may not be prepared for
the conclusion plainly suggested by the phrase, “The
physical basis or matter of life,” that there
is some one kind of matter which is common to all
living beings, and that their endless diversities are
bound together by a physical, as well as an ideal,
unity. In fact, when first apprehended, such
a doctrine as this appears almost shocking to common
sense.
What, truly, can seem to be more obviously different
from one another, in faculty, in form, and in substance,
than the various kinds of living beings? What
community of faculty can there be between the bright-coloured
lichen, which so nearly resembles a mere mineral incrustation
of the bare rock on which it grows, and the painter,
to whom it is instinct with beauty, or the botanist,
whom it feeds with knowledge?