Madame Eglentyne
CHAUCER’S PRIORESS IN REAL LIFE
Ther was also a Nonne,
a Prioresse,
That of her smyling
was ful simple and coy;
Hir grettest ooth was
ne but by seynt Loy;
And she was cleped madame
Eglentyne.
Ful wel she song the
service divyne,
Entuned in hir nose
ful semely;
And Frensh she spak
ful faire and fetisly,
After the scole of Stratford
atte Bowe,
For Frensh of Paris
was to hir unknowe.
At mete wel y-taught
was she with-alle;
She leet no morsel from
hir lippes falle,
Ne wette hir fingres
in hir sauce depe.
Wel coude she carie
a morsel and wel kepe,
That no drope ne fille
up-on hir brest.
In curteisye was set
ful muche hir lest.
Hir over lippe wyped
she so clene,
That in hir coppe was
no ferthing sene
Of grece, whan she dronken
haddie hir draughte
Ful semely after hir
mete she raughte,
And sikerly she was
of greet disport,
And ful plesaunt and
amiable of port,
And peyned hir to countrefete
chere
Of court, and been estatlich
of manere,
And to be holden digne
of reverence.
But, for to speken of
hir conscience,
She was so charitable
and so pitous,
She wolde wepe, if that
she sawe a mous
Caught in a trap, if
it were deed or bledde.
Of smale houndes had
she, that she fedde
With rosted flesh, or
milk and wastel-breed.
But sore weep she if
oon of hem were deed,
Or if men smoot it with
a yerde smerte:
And al was conscience
and tendre herte
Ful semely hir wimpel
pinched was:
Hir nose tretys; her
eyen greye as glas;
Hir mouth ful smal,
and ther-to softe and reed;
But sikerly she hadde
a fair foreheed;
It was almost a spanne
brood, I trowe;
For, hardily, she was
nat undergrowe.
Ful fetis was hir cloke,
as I was war.
Of smal coral aboute
hir arm she bar
A peire of bedes, gauded
al with grene;
And ther-on heng a broche
of gold ful shene,
On which ther was first
write a crowned A,
And after, Amor vincit
omnia!
—GEOFFREY CHAUCER
Prologue to the Canterbury Tales
Every one knows Chaucer’s description of the Prioress, Madame Eglentyne, who rode with that very motley and talkative company on the way to Canterbury. There is no portrait in his gallery which has given rise to more diverse comment among critics. One interprets it as a cutting attack on the worldliness of the Church; another thinks that Chaucer meant to draw a charming and sympathetic picture of womanly gentleness; one says that it is a caricature, another an ideal; and an American professor even finds in it a psychological study of thwarted maternal instinct,