Along with the above-mentioned consider the local historians, who have searched with laborious curiosity into the transactions of some one particular nation.  These men, wishing by all means to enrich and adorn the Sparta which they had gotten for their own, and to that effect not passing over in silence even such things as banquets of unusual splendour, or sleeved tunics, or hilts of daggers, or gilt spurs, and other such minutiae having any smack of revelry about them, surely, if they had heard of any change in religion, or any falling off from the standard of early ages, would have related it, many of them; or, if not many, at least several; if not several, some one anyhow.  Not one, well-disposed or ill-disposed towards us, has related anything of the sort, or even dropped the slightest hint of the same.

For example.  Our adversaries grant us,—­they cannot do otherwise,—­that the Roman Church was at one time holy, Catholic, Apostolic, at the time when it deserved these eulogiums from St. Paul:  Your faith is spoken of in the whole world.  Without ceasing I make a commemoration of you.  I know that when I come to you, I shall come in the abundance of the blessing of Christ.  All the Churches of Christ salute you.  Your obedience is published in every place (Rom. i. 8, 9; xv. 29; xvi. 17, 19):  at the time when Paul, being kept there in free custody, was spreading the gospel (Acts xxviii. 31) :  at the time when Peter once in that city was ruling the Church gathered at Babylon (1 Peter v. 13):  at the time when that Clement, so singularly praised by the Apostle (Phil. iv. 3) was governing the Church:  at the time when the pagan Caesars, Nero, Domitian, Trajan, Antoninus, were butchering the Roman Pontiffs:  also at the time when, as even Calvin bears witness, Damasus, Siricius, Anastasius and Innocent guided the Apostolic bark.  For at this epoch he generously allows that men, at Rome particularly, had so far not swerved from Gospel teaching.  When then did Rome lose this faith so highly celebrated? when did she cease to be what she was before? at what time, under what Pontiff, by what way, by what compulsion, by what increments, did a foreign religion come to pervade city and world?  What outcries, what disturbances, what lamentations did it provoke?  Were all mankind all over the rest of the world lulled to sleep, while Rome, Rome I say, was forging new Sacraments, a new Sacrifice, new religious dogma?  Has there been found no historian, neither Greek nor Latin, neither far nor near, to fling out in his chronicles even an obscure hint of so remarkable a proceeding?

Therefore this much is clear, that the articles of our belief are what History, manifold and various, History the messenger of antiquity, and life of memory, utters and repeats in abundance; while no narrative penned in human times records that the doctrines foisted in by our opponents ever had any footing in the Church.  It is clear, I say, that the historians are mine, and that the adversary’s raids upon history are utterly without point.  No impression can they make unless the assertion be first received, that all Christians of all ages had lapsed into gross infidelity and gone down to the abyss of hell, until such time as Luther entered into an unblessed union with Catherine Bora.