“Speaking at Newmarch, near Barnsley, last month, Mr. Waddy drew a heartrending picture of the tyranny practised in Ireland, and illustrated his theme and moved his audience to the execration of Mr. Balfour by the artistic recital of a horrible tale.  He declared that a little child had been barbarously sentenced by resident magistrates to a month’s imprisonment for throwing a stone at a policeman.  Some hard-headed or hard-hearted Yorkshireman, however, would not believe Mr. Waddy offhand, and challenged him to declare names, place, and date.  On the 15th of November, Mr. Waddy gave the following particulars in writing.  He stated that the magistrates who had imposed the brutal punishment were Mr. Hill and Colonel Bowlby, that the case was tried at Keenagh on the 23rd of April, 1888, that the child’s name was Thomas Quin, aged nine, and that the charge was throwing stones at the police.

“The clue thus afforded has been followed up.  It is grievous that cool and calculating investigation should spoil a pretty story, but here is the truth.

“On the 20th of April, before Colonel Stewart and Colonel Bowlby, resident magistrates, Thomas Quin, aged 19 years, was convicted of using intimidation towards William Nutley, in consequence of his having done an act which he had a legal right to do—­viz., to evict a labourer, Michael Fegan, of Clearis, who refused to work for him.  Thomas Quin was sentenced to one month’s imprisonment.

“I am quite sure that Mr. Waddy will publicly acknowledge that he played upon the feelings of his hearers with a trumped-up tale of woe, but I wonder whether anything will teach the British political tourist that a great number of my countrymen unfortunately feel a genuine delight in hoaxing them.

“Your obedient servant,

“AN IRISH LIBERAL.”

As for the assertion of poverty and inability to pay, so invariably made to excuse defaulting tenants, I will give these two instances to the contrary.

“Writing on behalf of Mr. Balfour to Mr. E. Bannister, of Hyde, Cheshire, Mr. George Wyndham, M.P., recounts a somewhat remarkable circumstance in connection with the position and circumstances of a tenant on Lord Kenmare’s estate who declined to pay his rent on the plea of poverty:—­’Irish Office, Nov. 28, 1889.  Dear Sir,—­In reply to your letter of the 22nd inst., I beg to inform you that I have made careful inquiries into the case of Molloy, a tenant on Lord Kenmare’s estate.  I find that so far from exaggerating the scope of this incident, you somewhat understate the case.  The full particulars were as follow:—­The estate bailiffs visited the house of Molloy, a tenant who owed L30 rent and arrears.  They seized his cows, and then called at his home to ask him if he would redeem them by paying the debt.  Molloy stated that he was willing to pay, but that he had only L7 altogether.  He handed seven notes to the bailiff, who found that one of them was a L5 note, so that