parrot, with whom I was on intimate terms, were not
creatures like myself, but were brutal whilst I was
reasonable, I not only did not believe it, but quite
consciously and intellectually formed the opinion
that the distinction was false; so that afterwards,
when Darwin’s views were first unfolded to me,
I promptly said that I had found out all that for
myself before I was ten years old; and I am far from
sure that my youthful arrogance was not justified;
for this sense of the kinship of all forms of life
is all that is needed to make Evolution not only a
conceivable theory, but an inspiring one. St Anthony
was ripe for the Evolution theory when he preached
to the fishes, and St Francis when he called the birds
his little brothers. Our vanity, and our snobbish
conception of Godhead as being, like earthly kingship,
a supreme class distinction instead of the rock on
which Equality is built, had led us to insist on God
offering us special terms by placing us apart from
and above all the rest of his creatures. Evolution
took that conceit out of us; and now, though we may
kill a flea without the smallest remorse, we at all
events know that we are killing our cousin. No
doubt it shocks the flea when the creature that an
almighty Celestial Flea created expressly for the
food of fleas, destroys the jumping lord of creation
with his sharp and enormous thumbnail; but no flea
will ever be so foolish as to preach that in slaying
fleas Man is applying a method of Natural Selection
which will finally evolve a flea so swift that no man
can catch him, and so hardy of constitution that Insect
Powder will have no more effect on him than strychnine
on an elephant.
WHY DARWIN PLEASED THE SOCIALISTS
The Humanitarians were not alone among the agitators
in their welcome to Darwin. He had the luck to
please everybody who had an axe to grind. The
Militarists were as enthusiastic as the Humanitarians,
the Socialists as the Capitalists. The Socialists
were specially encouraged by Darwin’s insistence
on the influence of environment. Perhaps the strongest
moral bulwark of Capitalism is the belief in the efficacy
of individual righteousness. Robert Owen made
desperate efforts to convince England that her criminals,
her drunkards, her ignorant and stupid masses, were
the victims of circumstance: that if we would
only establish his new moral world we should find
that the masses born into an educated and moralized
community would be themselves educated and moralized.
The stock reply to this is to be found in Lewes’s
Life of Goethe. Lewes scorned the notion that
circumstances govern character. He pointed to
the variety of character in the governing rich class
to prove the contrary. Similarity of circumstance
can hardly be carried to a more desolating dead level
than in the case of the individuals who are born and
bred in English country houses, and sent first to Eton
or Harrow, and then to Oxford or Cambridge, to have