[Footnote 76:  See Swift’s “Journal to Stella,” Letter xxxv. (vol. ii., pp. 283-84), and “A True Relation of the Intended Riot,” printed in Scott’s edition, vol. v., pp. 399-413. [W.S.J.]

“The burning of a Pope in effigy,” notes Scott—­in his reprint of what Swift called “the Grub Street account of the tumult”—­“upon the 17th November, the anniversary of Queen Elizabeth’s coronation, was a favourite pastime with the mob of London, and often employed by their superiors as a means of working upon their passions and prejudices.”  A full account of this ceremony is given in his edition of Dryden’s Works, 1808, vol. vi., p. 222.  An account of the attempt “to revive an old ceremony,” referred to by Swift, was published also in “The Post Boy” for November 20th, 1711. [T.S.]]

But this attempt, to whatever purposes intended, proving wholly abortive by the vigilance of those in power, the Duke’s arrival was without any noise or consequence; and upon consulting with his friends, he soon fell in with their new scheme for preventing the peace.  It was believed by many persons, that the ministers might, with little difficulty, have brought him over, if they had pleased to make a trial; for as he would probably have accepted any terms to continue in a station of such prodigious[77] profit, so there was sufficient room to work upon his fears, of which he is seldom unprovided[78] (I mean only in his political capacity) and his infirmity very much increased by his unmeasurable possessions, which have rendered him, ipsique[79] onerique timentem; but reason, as well as the event, proved this to be a mistake:  for the ministers being determined to bring the war to as speedy an issue as the honour and safety of their country would permit, could not possibly recompense the Duke for the mighty incomes he held by the continuance of it.  Then the other party had calculated their numbers; and by the accession of the Earl of Nottingham, whose example they hoped would have many followers, and the successful solicitations of the Duke of Somerset, found they were sure of a majority in the House of Lords:  so that in this view of circumstances, the Duke of Marlborough thought he acted with security, as well as advantage:  he therefore boldly fell, with his whole weight, into the design of ruining the ministry, at the expense of his duty to his sovereign, and the welfare of his country, after the mighty obligations he had received from both.  WHIG and TORY were now no longer the dispute, but THE QUEEN or THE DUKE OF MARLBOROUGH:  He was at the head of all the cabals and consults with Bothmar, Buys, and the discontented lords.  He forgot that government of his passion, for which his admirers used to celebrate him, fell into all the impotencies of anger and violence upon every party debate:  so that the Queen found herself under a necessity, either on the one side to sacrifice those friends, who had ventured their lives in rescuing her out of the power of some, whose former treatment she