declaration of his Christianity was sufficient; but, strange to say, his apology has not a word about it.  We are left to gather it from some expressions which imply that he is a Protestant; but we did not wish to inquire into the niceties of his orthodoxy.  To his friends of the old persuasion the distinction was impertinent; for what cares Rabbi Ben Kimchi for the differences which have split our novelty?  To the great body of Christians that hold the Pope’s supremacy—­that is to say, to the major part of the Christian world—­his religion will appear as much to seek as ever.  But perhaps he conceived that all Christians are Protestants, as children, and the common people call all that are not animals Christians.  The mistake was not very considerable in so young a proselyte.  Or he might think the general (as logicians speak) involved in the particular.  All Protestants are Christians; but I am a Protestant; ergo, etc.:  as if a marmoset, contending to be a man, overleaping that term as too generic and vulgar, should at once roundly proclaim himself to be a gentleman.  The argument would be, as we say, ex abundanti.  From whichever cause this excessus in terminis proceeded, we can do no less than congratulate the general state of Christendom upon the accession of so extraordinary a convert.  Who was the happy instrument of the conversion we are yet to learn:  it comes nearest to the attempt of the late pious Doctor Watts to Christianize the Psalms of the Old Testament.  Something of the old Hebrew raciness is lost in the transfusion; but much of its asperity is softened and pared down in the adaptation.

“The appearance of so singular a treatise at this conjuncture has set us upon an inquiry into the present state of religion upon the stage generally.  By the favor of the church-wardens of Saint Martin’s in the Fields, and Saint Paul’s, Covent Garden, who have very readily, and with great kindness, assisted our pursuit, we are enabled to lay before the public the following particulars.  Strictly speaking, neither of the two great bodies is collectively a religious institution.  We had expected to have found a chaplain among them, as at Saint Stephen’s, and other Court establishments; and were the more surprised at the omission, as the last Mr. Bengough, at the one house, and Mr. Powell at the other, from a gravity of speech and demeanor, and the habit of wearing black at their first appearances in the beginning of fifth or the conclusion of fourth acts, so eminently pointed out their qualifications for such office.  These corporations, then, being not properly congregational, we must seek the solution of our question in the tastes, attainments, accidental breeding, and education of the individual members of them.  As we were prepared to expect, a majority at both houses adhere to the religion of the Church Established, only that at one of them a pretty strong leaven of Catholicism is suspected,—­which, considering