friends please, that is, and without formality, if
it should give you any pleasure. He is a writer
of great power, I think. And this reminds me that
you may be looking all the while for the ‘Athenaeum’s’
reply to your friend’s proposition—of
which I lost no time in apprising the editor, Mr.
Dilke, and here are some of his words: ’An
American friend who had been long in England, and
often conversed with me on the subject, resolved on
his return to establish such a correspondence.
In all things worth knowing—all reviews
of good books’ (which ’are published first
or simultaneously,’ says Mr. Dilke, ’in
London’), ’he was anticipated, and after
some months he was driven of necessity to geological
surveys, centenary celebrations, progress of railroads,
manufactures, &c., and thus the prospect was abandoned
altogether.’ Having made this experiment,
Mr. Dilke is unwilling to risk another. Neither
must we blame him for the reserve. When the international
copyright shall at once protect the national meum
and tuum in literature and give it additional
fullness and value, we shall cease to say insolently
to you that what we want of your books we will get
without your help, but as it is, the Mr. Dilkes of
us have nothing much more courteous to do. I
wish I could have been of any use to your friend—I
have done what I could. In regard to critical
papers of mine, I would willingly give myself up to
you, seeing your good nature; but it is the truth
that I never published any prose papers at all except
the series on the Greek Christian poets and the other
series on the English poets in the ‘Athenaeum’
of last year, and both of which you have probably
seen. Afterwards I threw up my brief and went
back to my poetry, in which I feel that I must do whatever
I am equal to doing at all. That life is short
and art long appears to us more true than usual when
we lie all day long on a sofa and are as frightened
of the east wind as if it were a tiger. Life is
not only short, but uncertain, and art is not only
long, but absorbing. What have I to do with writing
‘scandal’ (as Mr. Jones would say)
upon my neighbour’s work, when I have not finished
my own? So I threw up my brief into Mr. Dilke’s
hands, and went back to my verses. Whenever I
print another volume you shall have it, if Messrs.
Wiley and Putnam will convey it to you. How can
I send you, by the way, anything I may have to send
you? Why will you not, as a nation, embrace our
great penny post scheme, and hold our envelopes in
all acceptation? You do not know—cannot
guess—what a wonderful liberty our Rowland
Hill has given to British spirits, and how we ‘flash
a thought’ instead of ‘wafting’
it from our extreme south to our extreme north, paying
’a penny for our thought’ and for the
electricity included. I recommend you our penny
postage as the most successful revolution since the
‘glorious three days’ of Paris.