every man, woman, and child in the Quirinal, with
the exception of his Holiness, unless he accepted
their terms. He should have gone out to them and
so died, but having missed that opportunity, nothing
remained but flight. He was a mere Pope hostage
as long as he stayed in Rome. Curious, the ‘intervention
of the French,’ so long desired by the Italians,
and vouchsafed so.[186] The Florentines open
their eyes in mute astonishment, and some of them
‘won’t read the journals any more.’
The boldest say softly that the Romans are sure
not to bear it. And what is to happen in
France? Why, what a world we have just now....
Father Prout is gone to Rome for a fortnight, has
stayed three weeks, and day by day we expect him back
again. I don’t understand how the Prout
papers should have hurt him ecclesiastically, but that
he should be known for their writer is not
astonishing, as the secret was never, I believe, attempted
to be kept. We have been, at least I have
been, a little anxious lately about the fate of the
’Blot on the ‘Scutcheon,’ which
Mr. Phelps applied for my husband’s permission
to revive at Sadler’s. Of course, putting
the request was a mere form, as he had every right
to act the play, and there was nothing to answer but
one thing. Only it made one anxious—made
me anxious—till we heard the result,
and we, both of us, are very grateful to dear Mr.
Chorley, who not only made it his business to be at
the theatre the first night, but, before he slept,
sat down like a true friend to give us the story of
the result, and never, he says, was a more complete
and legitimate success. The play went straight
to the heart of the audience, it seems, and we hear
of its continuance on the stage from the papers.
So far, so well. You may remember, or may not
have heard, how Macready brought it out and put his
foot on it in the flash of a quarrel between manager
and author, and Phelps, knowing the whole secret and
feeling the power of the play, determined on making
a revival of it on his own theatre, which was wise,
as the event proves. Mr. Chorley called his acting
really ‘fine.’ I see the second edition
of the ‘Poetical Works’ advertised at last
in the ‘Athenaeum,’ and conclude it to
be coming out directly. Also my second edition
is called for, only nothing is yet arranged on that
point. We have had a most interesting letter
from Mr. Home, giving terrible accounts, to be sure,
of the submersion of all literature in England and
France since the French Revolution, but noble and
instructive proof of individual wave-riding energy,
such as I have always admired in him. He and his
wife, he says, live chiefly on the produce of their
garden, and keep a cheerful heart for the rest; even
the ‘Institutes’ expect gratuitous lectures,
so that the sweat of the brain seems less productive
than the sweat of the brow. I am glad that Mr.
Serjeant Talfourd and his wife spoke affectionately
of my husband, for he is attached to both of them....