have the firmness of keeping laws nor the fun of breaking them.  The largeness of this universe had nothing of that freshness and airy outbreak which we have praised in the universe of the poet.  This modern universe is literally an empire; that is, it was vast, but it is not free.  One went into larger and larger windowless rooms, rooms big with Babylonian perspective; but one never found the smallest window or a whisper of outer air.

Their infernal parallels seemed to expand with distance; but for me all good things come to a point, swords for instance.  So finding the boast of the big cosmos so unsatisfactory to my emotions I began to argue about it a little; and I soon found that the whole attitude was even shallower than could have been expected.  According to these people the cosmos was one thing since it had one unbroken rule.  Only (they would say) while it is one thing, it is also the only thing there is.  Why, then, should one worry particularly to call it large?  There is nothing to compare it with.  It would be just as sensible to call it small.  A man may say, “I like this vast cosmos, with its throng of stars and its crowd of varied creatures.”  But if it comes to that why should not a man say, “I like this cosy little cosmos, with its decent number of stars and as neat a provision of live stock as I wish to see”?  One is as good as the other; they are both mere sentiments.  It is mere sentiment to rejoice that the sun is larger than the earth; it is quite as sane a sentiment to rejoice that the sun is no larger than it is.  A man chooses to have an emotion about the largeness of the world; why should he not choose to have an emotion about its smallness?

It happened that I had that emotion.  When one is fond of anything one addresses it by diminutives, even if it is an elephant or a life-guardsman.  The reason is, that anything, however huge, that can be conceived of as complete, can be conceived of as small.  If military moustaches did not suggest a sword or tusks a tail, then the object would be vast because it would be immeasurable.  But the moment you can imagine a guardsman you can imagine a small guardsman.  The moment you really see an elephant you can call it “Tiny.”  If you can make a statue of a thing you can make a statuette of it.  These people professed that the universe was one coherent thing; but they were not fond of the universe.  But I was frightfully fond of the universe and wanted to address it by a diminutive.  I often did so; and it never seemed to mind.  Actually and in truth I did feel that these dim dogmas of vitality were better expressed by calling the world small than by calling it large.  For about infinity there was a sort of carelessness which was the reverse of the fierce and pious care which I felt touching the pricelessness and the peril of life.  They showed only a dreary waste; but I felt a sort of sacred thrift.  For economy is far more romantic than extravagance.  To them stars were an unending income of halfpence; but I felt about the golden sun and the silver moon as a schoolboy feels if he has one sovereign and one shilling.