But Sydney Smith was not content with a system of thought which provided him with a working hypothesis for the construction of the physical universe and the conduct of this present life.  He looked above and beyond; and reinforced his own faith in immortality by an appeal to the general sense of mankind.—­

“Who ever thinks of turning into ridicule our great and ardent hope of a world to come?  Whenever the man of humour meddles with these things, he is astonished to find that in all the great feelings of their nature the mass of mankind always think and act aright; that they are ready enough to laugh, but that they are quite as ready to drive away, with indignation and contempt, the light fool who comes with the feather of wit to crumble the bulwarks of truth, and to beat down the Temples of God.  We count over the pious spirits of the world, the beautiful writers, the great statesmen, all who have invented subtlely, who have thought deeply, who have executed wisely:—­all these are proofs that we are destined for a second life; and it is not possible to believe that this redundant vigour, this lavish and excessive power, was given for the mere gathering of meat and drink.  If the only object is present existence, such faculties are cruel, are misplaced, are useless.  They all show us that there is something great awaiting us,—­that the soul is now young and infantine, springing up into a more perfect life when the body falls into dust.”

“Man is imprisoned here only for a season, to take a better or a worse hereafter, as he deserves it.  This old truth is the fountain of all goodness, and justice, and kindness among men:  may we all feel it intimately, obey it perpetually, and profit by it eternally!”

He was not a theist only, but a Christian.  Here again, as in the argument from Design, he followed Paley, laid great stress on Evidences, and “selected his train of reasoning with some care from the best writers.”  He said;—­“The truth of Christianity depends upon its leading facts, and of these we have such evidence as ought to satisfy us, till it appears that mankind have ever been deceived by proofs as numerous and as strong.”  Having convinced himself that the Christian religion was true, he was loyal in word and act to what he had accepted.  He remonstrated vigorously against an “anti-Christian article” which crept into the Edinburgh Review; and felt, as keenly as the strongest sacerdotalist or the most fervent Evangelical, the bounden duty of defending the body of truth to which his Ordination had pledged him.