the Hon. William H. English, of Indiana, has just come to light.  It seems that that gentleman’s venerable father, Deacon Elisha English, lives in Scott County, Ind., where he is a highly esteemed citizen and a bright light in the Methodist church.  Not long ago the church people concluded they ought to have some improvements upon their modest temple of worship, and consequently a subscription paper was circulating among the members of the congregation.  Deacon English readily signified his willingness to do his share toward the proposed improvements, and he led off the subscription list with the line: 

  Elisha English $50.00

The congregation were so much pleased with this that they determined to apply to William H. English, the son, for a donation, and they believed that the liberality of the father would serve as an inducement to the son to display at least a moderate generosity.  Accordingly the subscription list was forwarded to Indianapolis, and a prominent Methodist of that city took it around to Mr. English’s office.  The ex-vice-president hemmed and hawed and fumbled the paper over for quite a while, and finally, with a profound sigh, sat down at his desk and scribbled a few words on the subscription sheet.  The triumphant smile on the visiting churchman’s face relaxed into an expression of combined amazement and dismay when, upon regaining the paper, he learned that Mr. English had reconstructed the first line, so that it read: 

  Elisha English and Son $50.00

This column will serve two purposes—­to illustrate the truly American spirit of levity in which Eugene Field regarded politics and politicians, and also the extent and general character of his daily “wood sawing” for nearly twelve years.  Although these selections cover a period of many years, they fairly represent the character of his political paragraphs on any one day except in the matter of subjects.  These, of course, varied from day to day, from the President of the United States down to the Chicago bridge-tender.  What delighted him most was some matter-of-fact announcement such as that which credited Herman H. Kohlsaat, then editor of the Chicago Inter-Ocean and a delegate to the Republican National Convention of 1892, with saying that he had no particular choice for Vice-President, but he favored the nomination of some colored Republican as a fitting recognition of the loyalty of the colored voters to the memory and party of Lincoln.  The cunningly foreseen consequence was that what Mr. Kohlsaat gained in popularity with the colored brethren he lost in the estimation of those serious-minded souls who swallowed the hoax.  Among the latter were many fire-eating editors in the South who seized upon Field’s self-evident absurdity to denounce Mr. Kohlsaat as a violent demagogue who sought to curry favor with black Republicans at the expense of the South.  It was also accepted as fairly representing the Northern disposition to