that all this shower of criticism had tanned the
fair author’s hide—we speak metaphorically—until
it was impervious to every unkindly influence.
But so far from being bomb-proof, Mrs. Wilcox is even
more sensitive than when she bestrode her Pegasus for
the first time and soared into that dreamy realm
where the lyric muse abides. There is not a
quip nor a quillet from the slangy pen of the daily
newspaper writers that she does not brood over and
worry about as heartily as if it were an overdue
mortgage on her pianoforte. We presume to say
that the protests which she has made within the last
two years against the utterances of the press would
fill a tome. Now this Joyce affair is simply
preposterous; we do not imagine that there is in
America at the present time an ordinarily intelligent
person who has ever believed for one moment that
Colonel Joyce wrote the poem in question—the
poem entitled “Love and Laughter.”
Colonel Joyce is an incorrigible practical joker,
and his humor has been marvellously tickled by the
prodigious worry his jest has cost the Wisconsin
bard. The public understands the situation; there
is no good reason why Mrs. Wilcox should fume and
fret and scurry around, all on account of that poem,
like a fidgety hen with one chicken. Her claim
is universally conceded; there is no shadow of doubt
that she wrote the poem in question, and by becoming
involved in any further complication on this subject
she will simply make a laughing-stock of herself;
we would be sorry to see her do that.
And yet whenever his stock of subjects for comment
or raillery ran low he would write a letter to himself,
asking the address of Colonel John A. Joyce, the author
of “Love and Laughter,” and manage in his
answer to open up the whole controversy afresh.
I suppose that to this day there are thousands of
good people in the United States whose innocence has
been abused by Field’s superserviceable defence
of Mrs. Wilcox’s title to “Laugh and the
World Laughs with You.” It was delicious
fooling to him and to those of us who were on the inside,
but I question if Mrs. Wilcox ever appreciated its
humorous aspect.
Speaking of his practice of getting public attention
for his own compositions through a letter of his own
“To the Editor,” the following affords
a good example of his ingenious method, with his reply:
EVANSTON, ILL., Aug. 15, 1888.
To the Editor:
Several of us are very anxious to learn
the authorship of the following
poem, which is to be found in so many
scrap-books, and which ever and
anon appears as a newspaper waif:
RESIGNATION
I have a dear canary bird,
That every morning
sings
The sweetest songs I ever
heard,
And flaps his
yellow wings.
I love to sit the whole day
long
Beside the window-sill,
And listen to the joyous song
That warbler loves
to trill.