The first essay is devoted to an examination of the ways of Nature as unmodified by the voluntary agency of man.  These the author finds worthy of all abhorrence; and Nature in its purely physical aspect he considers to be full of blemishes, which are patent to the eye of modern science, and which “all but monkish quietists think it a religious duty to amend.”  A competent master-workman with good materials would not have turned out a world so “bunglingly” made, with great patches of poisonous morass and arid desert unfit for human habitation, with coal and other requisites for man’s comfort stored away out of sight, with the rivers all unbridged, and mountains and other impediments thrown in the way of free locomotion.  So far, then, from its being man’s duty to imitate Nature, as some have thought it was, it is incumbent upon him to oppose her with all his powers, because of her gross injustice in the realm of morals, and to remedy her physical defects as far as lies in his power.  On this view of Nature our fathers were wiser in their generation than we when they trimmed their trees into grotesque shapes and laid out their landscapes in geometric lines; when in medicine they substituted the lancet and unlimited mercury for the vis medicatrix naturae; when in philosophy they dictated to Nature from their internal consciousness, before Bacon introduced the heresy of induction; when in politics they had a profound faith in statutes and none at all in statistics; when in education they conscientiously rammed down the ologies at the point of the ferule, in blissful ignorance of psychology.  If Mr. Mill finds it necessary to rail at Nature because she did not put coal on the top of the ground and build bridges and dig wells for man’s convenience, why not call her a jade at once because she does not grow ready-made clothing of the latest mode in sizes to suit, because the trees do not bear hot rolls and coffee, and because Mr. Mill’s philosophy is not an intuition of the mind?  He is less restrained in speaking of the moral enormities of Nature.  Altogether the most striking passage in the book is his indictment of the Author of Nature, which is truly Satanic in its audacity and hardly to be paralleled in literature for its impiety; for it is impious even from Mr. Mill’s standpoint, since he admits that the weight of evidence tends to prove that Nature’s Author is both wise and good.  We transcribe only some of his expressions:  “Nearly all things which men are hanged or imprisoned for doing to one another are Nature’s every-day performances;” she “has a hundred hideous deaths” reserved for her victims, “such as the ingenious cruelty of a Nabis or a Domitian never surpassed,” which “she uses with the most supercilious disregard both of mercy and justice;” “she inflicts torture in apparent wantonness;” “everything which the worst men commit against life and property is perpetrated on a larger scale by natural agents;” “Nature has noyades more fatal