Consanguineous Marriages in the American Population eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 82 pages of information about Consanguineous Marriages in the American Population.

Consanguineous Marriages in the American Population eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 82 pages of information about Consanguineous Marriages in the American Population.
TABLE XIII.
------------------------------------------------------------
------ | | Sex of Children. | |Number |-----------------------|Mascu-Marriages. |Fertile.| Male.|Female.|Unknown.|linity. ------------------------------------------------------------
------ 1st cousin.  Gene. | 125 | 318 | 314 | 40 | 101 Unrelated.  Gene. | 629 | 1561 | 1559 | 64 | 100 Ch. of 1st cousins.  Gene.| 170 | 402 | 375 | 48 | 107 Other cousin.  Gene. | 301 | 736 | 666 | 15 | 111 1st Cousin.  Cor. | 150 | 316 | 295 | 148 | 107 Ch. of 1st cousins.  Cor. | 124 | 192 | 164 | 214 | 111 Miscellaneous | 88 | 210 | 205 | 50 | 102 ------------------------------------------------------------
------ Total | 1587 | 3735 | 3578 | 578 | 104.4 ------------------------------------------------------------
------

It is of course impossible to explain all the ratios in this table.  Much variation is here due to chance, and a few additional cases might appreciably change any of the ratios.  It will be noticed, however, that the two categories whose masculinity is most similar (100 and 101), are derived from cases taken from the same families and from the same environment, and differing only in that the first is closely consanguineous while the second is not.  The third and fourth groups, separated from the first two by at least a generation, and probably living in a different environment, differ greatly in masculinity from them.  In the fourth group are included 1-1/2, second, third, and a few even more distant cousins, all more distantly related than first cousins, and taken from the same genealogies as these; yet the masculinity is much greater.

An analysis of the cases collected fifty years ago by Dr. Bemiss, of course without thought of masculinity, gives the following result:[40]

TABLE XIV.
----------------------------------------------------------
|   Sex of Children.   |
|----------------------|
Marriage.        |Number.| Male.|Female.|Masculinity.
----------------------------------------------------------
1st cousins and nearer| 709   | 1245 | 1171  | 106.3
2d and 3rd cousins    | 124   |  264 |  240  | 110.0
All consanguineous    | 833   | 1509 | 1411  | 106.9
Unrelated             | 125   |  444 |  380  | 116.9
----------------------------------------------------------
pre>

[Footnote 40:  Bemiss, Report on Influence of Marriages of Consanguinity, pp. 420-423.]

In the “Marriage of Near Kin,” Mr. Huth gives a list of cases of consanguineous marriage collected by various persons from all over Europe.[41] He is free to say that they are worse than useless for the purpose for which they were collected, that of determining whether or not such marriages produce degeneracy, but in so far as the sex of the children is concerned they would not be biassed.

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
Consanguineous Marriages in the American Population from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.