The indignation of the people of Rowan, Guilford, Orange, and other counties, was aroused against such official misconduct.  On the 7th of March, 1771, a public meeting was held in Salisbury, when a large and influential committee was appointed, who, armed with the authority of the people, met the clerk, sheriff, and other officers of the crown, and compelled them to disgorge their unlawful extortions.  By a writing signed by these officers, they agreed to settle and pay back all moneys received over and above, their lawful fees.

This was indemnity for the past.  The security for the future was, that when any doubt should arise as to fees, they should not be paid to the officers themselves, but to such other persons as were appointed by the people.

Matthew Locke and Herman Husbands were among those selected to receive these lawful fees.  An instance, says Wheeler, “of more determined resistance, or of purer democracy, is not to be found in the annals of any people.”

Most of the histories of the day have done the Regulators great injustice, and denounced this whole body of men as composed of a factious and turbulent mob, who, without proper cause, disturbed the public tranquility.  Nothing could be more untrue or unjust.  Their assemblages were orderly, and some evidence of the temper and characters of the principal actors may be gathered from the fact that from these meetings, by a law of their own, they vigorously excluded all intoxicating drinks.  But they had been oppressed and exasperated by the impositions of corrupt officers until forbearance, with them, had ceased to be a a virtue.  On their side was the spirit of liberty, animating the discordant multitude, but, unfortunately, without trained leaders, or a sufficiency of arms, going forth to make its first essay at battle on American soil.  Redress of grievances was sought at first by the Regulators in a quiet way, by resorting to the courts of law.  The officers were indicted and found guilty, but the punishment was the mere nominal one of “a penny and costs.”  In short, all resorts to the tribunals of justice ended in a perfect mockery, and hastened the “War of the Regulation” in North Carolina.

The public press of that day was used by the Regulators in a peaceable way to set forth their grievances.  Their productions, circulated in manuscript, or in print, display no proofs of high scholarship, or of polished writing, but there is a truthful earnestness in some of them, and cogency of reasoning more effective than the skill of the mere rhetorician.  Sometimes they appeared in ballad form, and sometimes as simple narrative.  The rough poet of the period (the American Revolution can boast of many) was Rednap Howell, who taught the very children to sing, in doggerel verse, the infamy of the proud officials who were trampling on their rights.  A short selection from the many similar ones will be here presented for the amusement of the reader.