The country immediately round the mansion of the wealthy man was commonly his own estate.  A portion of this was frequently woodland, affording opportunities for hunting deer, wild boar, and other game.  For the boar the weapon was a stout spear, and the general practice of the sportsman was to wait at a certain spot until the beast was driven towards it by a ring of beaters.  Deer were caught in nets or transfixed with javelins while running.  In more open places the hunter, accompanied by hounds, rode after a hare.  But though far too much of Italy was taken up by preserves of this unproductive kind, the large estates were mostly turned to agricultural purposes.  Different owners, different practices; but the possessor of a number of country seats would in some cases work the land for himself by means of slaves—­often in disgrace and labouring in chains—­under the direction of a manager or bailiff, while in others he would parcel out his land on various terms among free tenants.  It is gratifying to discover that in bad seasons a generous landlord would sometimes remit a portion of his dues, and that he recognised various obligations of a grand seigneur to his district.  Among them was the keeping up and beautifying of the local shrines and contributing to buildings and works for the public comfort.

Such would be the country seat when established landward.  By the seaside, especially in a much-frequented resort like Baiae, the room was more limited and the equipment modified.  The extensive garden would be absent, and the height of the building increased by a second or even a third storey.  It was no uncommon thing for such a “villa,” as it was called, to stand out on a promontory, where it could be greeted by the sea on either side.  In many cases it was actually built out into the sea on piles or on a basis of concrete, and the occupant made a special delight of fishing from his window, and of letting the true sea-water flow into his swimming bath.

CHAPTER XI

ROMAN FURNITURE

On the customary furniture of a Roman house we need not spend many words.  For one thing, it was simple and scanty as compared with the furnishing and upholstering of to-day.  For another, its nature presents little that would be strange to us or that would require explanation.

Among the most conspicuous differences between Roman and modern furnishing must be reckoned the absence of carpets, the comparatively small use of tables and chairs, the absence of upholstery from such chairs as were used, and the greater part played by couches.  In place of carpets there were the ornamental floors, whether in geometrical pattern-work, arrangements of veined marbles, or mosaic pictures composed of small blocks of coloured stone or glass.  The making of carpets was well understood in the East, and Rome would have found no difficulty in obtaining as many as it chose, but so far as it employed tapestries they were for portieres and curtains, for the coverings of dining-couches and beds, or for throwing across a chair-back.  The Roman kept his floors, walls, pillars, and ceilings carefully cleared of dust and stains by means of brushes of feathers or light hair, brooms of palm or other leaves, and sponges.  He thus saved himself both the labour and the unwholesomeness of carpets.