off. At the Lanfranchi Palace they thought of
Byron, to see a curl of whose hair or a glove from
whose hand, Browning declares (so foolish was he and
ignorant) he would have gone farther than to see all
Wordsworth, Coleridge and Southey condensed in Rosicrucian
fashion into a vial. In the Campo Santo they
listened to a musical mass for the dead. In the
Duomo they heard the Friar preach. And early in
the morning their dreams were scattered by the harmonious
clangour of the church bells. “I never
was happy before in my life,” wrote Mrs Browning.
Her husband relieved her of all housekeeping anxieties.
At two o’clock came a light dinner—perhaps
thrushes and chianti—from the
trattoria;
at six appeared coffee and milk-rolls; at nine, when
the pine-fire blazed, roast chestnuts and grapes.
Debts there were none to vex the spirits of these
prudent children of genius. If a poet could not
pay his butcher’s and his baker’s bills,
Browning’s sympathies were all with the baker
and the butcher. “He would not sleep,”
wrote his wife, “if an unpaid bill dragged itself
by any chance into another week “; and elsewhere:
“Being descended from the blood of all the Puritans,
and educated by the strictest of dissenters, he has
a sort of horror about the dreadful fact of owing
five shillings five days.” Perhaps some
of this horror arose from the sense of that weight
which pecuniary cares hang upon all the more joyous
mountings of the mind. One grief and only one
was still present; Mr Barrett remained inexorable;
his daughter hoped that with time and patience his
arms would open to her again. It was a hope never
to be fulfilled. In the cordial comradeship of
Browning’s sister, Sarianna, a new correspondent,
there was a measure of compensation.
Already Browning had in view the collected edition
of his Poetical Works which did not appear until 1849.
The poems were to be made so lucid, “that everyone
who understood them hitherto” was to “lose
that mark of distinction.” Paracelsus
and Pippa were to be revised with special care.
The sales reported by Moxon were considered satisfactory;
but of course the profits as yet were those of his
wife’s poems. “She is,” he
wrote to his publisher, “there as in all else,
as high above me as I would have her.”
It was at Pisa that the highest evidence of his wife’s
powers as a poet came as an unexpected and wonderful
gift to her husband. In a letter of December
1845—more than a year since—she
had confessed that she was idle; and yet “silent”
was a better word she thought than “idle.”
Her apology was that the apostle Paul probably did
not work hard at tent-making during the week that
followed his hearing of the unspeakable things.
At the close of a letter written on July 22, 1846,
she wrote: “You shall see some day at Pisa
what I will not show you now. Does not Solomon
say that ‘there is a time to read what is written?’
If he doesn’t, he ought.” The time
to read had now come. “One day, early in