succeeded, and at the same time how highly the people in power seemed to be displeased, thought it more prudent to keep the paper in his cabinet.  However, having received some encouragement to collect into one volume all papers relating to Ireland, supposed to be written by the Drapier; and knowing how favourably that author’s writings in this kind have been received by the public; to make the volume more complete, [I procured a copy of the following letter from one of the author’s friends, with whom it was left, while the author was in England; and][4] I have printed it as near as I could in the order of time.

[Footnote 2:  Nichols, in the second volume of his Supplement to Swift’s Works (1779, 8vo), prints a note on this “Advertisement,” furnished him by Bowyer.  It is as follows: 

“1.  The first of the papers is said to be dated Oct. 6, 1724; and that it appears from thence to be dated a little after the proclamation against the Drapier’s fourth letter.  Now the fourth letter itself is dated Oct. 23, 1724.  This is a pardonable mistake anywhere, but, much more in a country where going before just coming after is the characteristic dialect.  But I little thought that the Dean, in his zeal for Ireland, would vouchsafe to adopt the shibboleth of it.

“2.  The Preface-writer, in the choice MS which he found, could discover the Dean’s name subscribed at the end of the original; but blotted out by some other hand.  As the former passage is a proof that the Advertisement was drawn up in Ireland, so this affords a strong presumption that it was under the direction of the Dean himself:  for who else could divine that his name was struck out by another hand?  Other ink it might be:  but in these recent MSS. of our age, it is the first time I ever heard of a blot carrying the evidence of a handwriting.  Whether the Dean or the printer hit this blot, I shall not inquire; but lay before you the pleasant procedure of the latter upon this discovery.  He had got, we see, the original in the Dean’s hand; but the name was obliterated.  What does he, but send away to England for a copy which might authenticate his original; and from such a copy the public is favoured with it!  I remember, in a cause before Sir Joseph Jekyll, a man began reading in court the title-deeds of an estate which was contested.  ‘The original is a little blind,’ says he; ’I have got a very fair copy of it, which I beg leave to go on with’—­’Hold,’ says Sir Joseph, ‘if the original is not good, the copy can never make it so.’  I am far, however, from accusing the printer of intending any fraud on the world.  He who tells his story so openly gives security enough for his honesty.  I can easily conceive the Advertisement might be in a good measure the Dean’s, who never was over-courteous to his readers, and might for once be content to be merry with them.” [T.S.]]

[Footnote 3:  Misprinted by Faulkner for Oct. 26th. [T.S.]]