powers.  By these operations, new channels of communication will be opened between the States, the lines of separation will disappear, their interests will be identified, and their union cemented by new and indissoluble bonds.”

Upon these hints, the young Senator delayed not to speak and act; nor did he wait for an amendment to the Constitution.  His first speech in the Senate was in favor of building a bridge over the Potomac; one of his first acts, to propose an appropriation of lands for a canal round the Falls of the Ohio at Louisville; and soon he brought forward a resolution directing the Secretary of the Treasury to report a system of roads and canals for the consideration of Congress.  The seed of the President’s Message had fallen into good ground.

Returning home at the end of the session, and reentering the Kentucky Legislature, we still find him a strict follower of Mr. Jefferson.  In support of the President’s non-intercourse policy (which was Franklin’s policy of 1775 applied to the circumstances of 1808), Mr. Clay proposed that the members of the Legislature should bind themselves to wear nothing that was not of American manufacture.  A Federalist, ignorant of the illustrious origin of this idea, ignorant that the homespun system had caused the repeal of the Stamp Act, and would have postponed the Revolution but for the accident of Lexington, denounced Mr. Clay’s proposition as the act of a shameless demagogue.  Clay challenged this ill-informed gentleman, and a duel resulted, in which two shots were exchanged, and both antagonists were slightly wounded.  Elected again to the Senate for an unexpired term, he reappeared in that body in 1809, and sat during two sessions.  Homespun was again the theme of his speeches.  His ideas on the subject of protecting and encouraging American manufactures were not derived from books, nor expressed in the language of political economy.  At his own Kentucky home, Mrs. Clay, assisted by her servants, was spinning and weaving, knitting and sewing, most of the garments required in her little kingdom of six hundred acres, while her husband was away over the mountains serving his country.  “Let the nation do what we Kentucky farmers are doing,” said Mr. Clay to the Senate.  “Let us manufacture enough to be independent of foreign nations in things essential,—­no more.”  He discoursed on this subject in a very pleasant, humorous manner, without referring to the abstract principle involved, or employing any of the technical language of economists.

His service in the Senate during these two sessions enhanced his reputation greatly, and the galleries were filled when he was expected to speak, little known as he was to the nation at large.  We have a glimpse of him in one of Washington Irving’s letters of February, 1811: