[Footnote 199:  Livy XXIII, 17-19; Strabo V, 4, 10.]

[Footnote 200:  Magistrates sociorum, Livy XLII, 1, 6-12.]

[Footnote 201:  For references etc., see Beloch, Italischer Bund, p. 170, notes 1 and 2.]

[Footnote 202:  The mention of one praetor in C.I.L., XIV, 2890, a dedication to Hercules, is later than other mention of two praetors, and is not irregular at any rate.]

[Footnote 203:  C.I.L., XIV, 3000, two aediles of the gens Saufeia, probably cousins.  In C.I.L., XIV, 2890, 2902, 2906, 2975, 2990, 2994, 2999, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3008, out of eighteen praetors, aediles, and quaestors mentioned, fifteen belong to the old families of Praeneste, two to families that belong to the people living back in the Sabines, and one to a man from Fidenae.]

[Footnote 204:  Cicero, pro Balbo, VIII, 21:  Leges de civili iure sunt latae:  quas Latini voluerunt, adsciverunt; ipsa denique Iulia lege civitas ita est sociis et Latinis data ut, qui fundi populi facti non essent civitatem non haberent.  Velleius Pater.  II, 16:  Recipiendo in civitatem, qui arma aut non ceperant aut deposuerant maturius, vires refectae sunt.  Gellius IV, 4, 3; Civitas universo Latio lege Iulia data est.  Appian, Bell.  Civ., I, 49:  [Greek:  Italioton de tous eti en tae symmachia paramenontas epsaephisato (ae boulae) einai politas, ou dae malista monon ou pantes epethymoun ktl.]

Marquardt, Staatsverw., I, p. 60; Greenidge, Roman Public Life, p. 311; Abbott, Roman Political Institutions, p. 102; Granrud, Roman Constitutional History, pp. 190-191.]

[Footnote 205:  Cicero, pro Archia, IV, 7:  Data est civitas Silvani lege et Carbonis:  si qui foederatis civitatibus adscripti fuissent, si tum cum lex ferebatur in Italia domicilium habuissent, et si sexaginta diebus apud praetorem essent professi.  See also Schol.  Bobiensia, p. 353 (Orelli corrects the mistake Silanus for Silvanus); Cicero, ad Fam., XIII, 30; Marquardt, Staatsverwaltung, I, p. 60.  Greenidge, Roman Public Life, p. 311 thinks this law did not apply to any but the incolae of federate communities; Abbott, Roman Political Institutions, p. 102.]

[Footnote 206:  Livy VIII, 14, 9:  Tiburtes Praenestinique agro multati, neque ob recens tantum rebellionis commune cum aliis Latinis crimen, etc., ... ceterisque Latinis populis conubia commerciaque et concilia inter se ademerunt.  Marquardt, Staatsverw., I, p. 46, n. 3, thinks not an aequum foedus, but from the words:  ut is populus alterius populi maiestatem comiter conservaret, a clause in the treaty found in Proculus, Dig., 49, 15, 7 (Corpus Iuris Civ., I, p. 833) (compare Livy IX, 20, 8:  sed ut in dicione populi Romani essent) thinks that the new treaty was an agreement based on dependence or clientage “ein Abhaengigkeits—­oder Clientelverhaeltniss.”]

[Footnote 207:  Mommsen, Geschichte des roem.  Muenzwesens, p. 179 (French trans, de Blacas, I, p. 186), thinks two series of aes grave are to be assigned to Praeneste and Tibur.]