he may think them in terms of notes, rests,
etc.,
as he composes. The poet need not see the scene
he is describing; verbal images may bear his meanings.
Of course this does not mean that object images may
not be present too, but the point is that the worker
is not dependent on them. The aid offered by
object images in time of difficulty is still more
open to doubt. As an illustration of what is
meant by this: Suppose a child to be given a carpeting
example in arithmetic which he finds himself unable
to solve. The claim is made that if he will then
call up a concrete image of the room, he will see
that the carpet is laid in strips and that suggestion
may set him right. But it has been proved experimentally
over and over again that if he doesn’t know
that carpets are laid that way, he will never get it
from the image, and if he does know it, he doesn’t
need an object image. It seems to be a fact that
object images do not function, in the sense that one
cannot get a correct answer as to color, or form, or
number from them. One can read off from a concrete
image what he knows to be true of it—or
else it is just guessing. “Knowing”
in each case involves observation and judgment, and
that means verbal images. Students whose power
of concrete imagery is low do, on the average, in situations
where a concrete image would supposedly help, just
as well as students whose power in this field is high.
It does seem to be true that object images give a
vividness and color to mental life which may result
in a keener appreciation of certain types of literature.
This warmth and vividness which object images add
to the mental processes of those who have them is
a boon.
On the whole, then, word images are the more valuable
of the two types. Upon them depends, primarily,
the ability to handle new situations, and even in
the constructive fields they are all sufficient.
These two facts, added to the fact that they are more
accurate, speedy, and general in application, makes
them a necessary part of the mental equipment of an
efficient worker, and means that much more attention
must be given to the development of productive symbol
images.
Two warnings should be borne in mind: First,
although the object images are not necessary in general,
as discussed above, to any given individual, because
of his particular habits of thought, they may be necessary
accompaniments to his mental processes. Second,
although object images may not help in giving understanding
or appreciation under new conditions, still the method
of asking students to try to image certain conditions
is worth while because it makes them stop and think,
which is always a help. Whether they get object
or word images in the process makes no difference.