[29] Palfrey, History of New England, in. 138-140.

[30] See Parkman, Conspiracy of Pontiac, i. 80-85.

[31] De Forest, History of the Indians of Connecticut, pp. 252, 257.

[32] The story rests chiefly upon the statements of Hutchinson, an extremely careful and judicious writer, and not in the least what the French call a gobemouche.  Goffe kept a diary which came into Hutchinson’s possession, and was one of the priceless manuscripts that perished in the infamous sacking of his house by the Boston mob of August 26, 1765.  What light that diary might have thrown upon the matter can never be known.  Hutchinson was born in 1711, only thirty-six years after the event, so that his testimony is not so very far removed from that of a contemporary.  Whalley seems to have died in Hadley shortly before 1675, and Goffe deemed it prudent to leave that neighbourhood in 1676.  His letters to Increase Mather are dated from “Ebenezer,” i. e., wherever in his roamings he set up his Ebenezer.  One of these letters, dated September 8, 1676, shows that his Ebenezer was then set up in Hartford, where probably he died about 1679 In 1676 the arrival of Edward Randolph (see below, p. 256) renewed the peril of the regicide judge, and his sudden removal from his skilfully contrived hiding-place at Hadley might possibly have been due to his having exposed himself to recognition in the Indian fight.  Possibly even the supernatural explanation might have been started, with a touch of Yankee humour, as a blind.  The silence of Mather and Hubbard was no more remarkable than some of the other ingenious incidents which had so long served to conceal the existence of this sturdy and crafty man.  The reasons for doubting the story are best stated by Mr. George Sheldon of Deerfield, in Hist.-Genealogical Register, October, 1874.

[33] If Philip was half the diplomatist that he is represented in tradition, he never would have gone into such a war without assurance of Narragansett help.  Canonchet was a far more powerful sachem than Philip, and played a more conspicuous part in the war.  May we not suppose that Canonchet’s desire to avenge his father’s death was one of the principal incentives to the war; that Philip’s attack upon Swanzey was a premature explosion; and that Canonchet then watched the course of events for a while before making up his mind whether to abandon Philip or support him?

[34] A wretched little werewolf who some few years ago, being then a lad of fourteen or fifteen years, most cruelly murdered two or three young children, just to amuse himself with their dying agonies.  The misdirected “humanitarianism,” which in our country makes every murderer an object of popular sympathy, prevailed to save this creature from the gallows.  Massachusetts has lately witnessed a similar instance of misplaced clemency in the case of a vile woman who had poisoned eight or ten persons,