When the king heard of this transaction he was furious.  He sent a letter to Boston, commanding the General Court to surrender the province again on repayment of this sum of L1250, and expressing his indignation that the people should thus dare to dispose of an important claim off-hand without consulting his wishes.  In the same letter the colony was enjoined to put in force the royal orders of seventeen years before, concerning the oath of allegiance, the restriction of the suffrage, and the prohibition of the Episcopal form of worship. [Sidenote:  The Gorges claim]

This peremptory message reached Boston about Christmas, 1679.  Leverett, the sturdy Ironsides, had died six months before, and his place was filled by Simon Bradstreet, a man of moderate powers but great integrity, and held in peculiar reverence as the last survivor of those that had been chosen to office before leaving England by the leaders of the great Puritan exodus.  Born in a Lincolnshire village in 1603, he was now seventy-six years old.  He had taken his degree at Emmanuel College, Cambridge, had served as secretary to the Earl of Warwick, and in 1629 had been appointed member of the board of assistants for the colony about to be established on Massachusetts bay.  In this position he had remained with honour for half a century, while he had also served as Federal Commissioner and as agent for the colony in London.  His wife, who died in 1672, was a woman of quaint learning and quainter verses, which her contemporaries admired beyond measure.  One of her books was republished in London, with the title:  “The Tenth Muse, lately sprung up in America.”  John Norton once said that if Virgil could only have heard the seraphic poems of Anne Bradstreet, he would have thrown his heathen doggerel into the fire.  She was sister of Joseph Dudley, and evidently inherited this rhyming talent, such as it was, from her father.  Governor Bradstreet belonged to the moderate party who would have been glad to extend the franchise, but he did not go with his brother-in-law in subservience to the king. [Sidenote:  Simon Bradstreet and his wife]

When the General Court assembled, in May, 1680, the full number of eighteen assistants appeared, for the first time in the history of the colony, and in accordance with an expressed wish of the king.  They were ready to yield in trifles, but not in essentials.  After wearisome discussion, the answer to the royal letter was decided on.  It stated in vague and unsatisfactory terms that the royal orders of 1662 either had been carried out already or would be in good time, while to the demand for the surrender of Maine no reply whatever was made, save that “they were heartily sorry that any actings of theirs should be displeasing to his Majesty.”  After this, when Randolph wrote home that the king’s letters were of no more account in Massachusetts than an old London Gazette, he can hardly be accused of stretching the truth.  Randolph kept busily at work, and