Is it possible to conceive any thing more provoking than this humble supplication of these remonstrators?  Does not this sound like a demand of the repeal of the Test, at the peril of those, who dare refuse it?  Is it not an application with a hat in one hand, and a sword in the other, and that too, in the style of a King of Ulster, to a King of Connaught, --“Repeal the Test, or if you don’t.........”

But to proceed in this narrative:  Notwithstanding the defeat of the dissenters in England, in their late attempt against the Test, their brethren in Ireland, are so far from being discouraged, that they seem now to conceive greater hopes of having it repealed here, than ever.[9] What grounds they have for these hopes, was a secret to us, and I presume, to themselves; however private whispers begin now to grow into general rumours, and their managers proceed with great art and assiduity, from feeling of pulses, to telling of noses.

[Footnote 9:  From this word to the end of this paragraph is omitted by Scott.[T.S.]]

In order to prepare necessaries, and furnish topics for this attempt, there was a paper printed upon the opening of last session, and now republished; entitled, “The Nature and Consequences of the Sacramental Test considered, with reasons humbly offered for the Repeal thereof."[10]

[Footnote 10:  This pamphlet was reprinted in London in 1732.  See note prefixed to “The Presbyterians’ Plea of Merit” [T.S.]]

It is not my intention, to follow this author, through all the mazes and windings of his reasoning upon this subject, which (in truth) seem such incoherent shreds, that it is impossible to tie them together; and therefore, what I purpose is, to answer such objections to the Test, as are advanced either by this author, or any other which have any appearance of reason, or plausibility.

I know it is not prudent to despise an adversary, nor fair to prepossess readers, before I show this bold and insolent writer, in his proper figure and dress; and therefore, however I may take him to be a feeble advocate for the repeal of the Test, in point of reasoning, yet I freely allow him to be a most resolute champion in point of courage, who has, with such intrepidity, attacked, not only the first enactors of this law, but all such, who shall continue it, by giving their negatives to a repeal.  I will in this “Correspondent” only transcribe a few quotations from this author, to shew the gallantry of this aggressor.

Page the 19th[11] he says:  “the truth is the imposition of the Test, and continuing it in such a state of the kingdom, appears (at first sight,) so great an absurdity in politics, as can never be accounted for.”

[Footnote 11:  Page 23 in edition London, 1732. [T.S.]]

Who are these absurd politicians?  Who first passed, and secondly continue the Sacramental Test, in all the preceding attempts of the Dissenters to repeal it?  Are they not the majority of both Houses of Parliament?[12]