Soon after the Reformation of the Church in England, under Edward the Sixth, upon Queen Mary’s succeeding to the crown, who restored Popery, many Protestants fled out of England, to escape the persecution raised against the Church, as her brother had left it established.  Some of these exiles went to Geneva; which city had received the doctrine of Calvin, and rejected the government of bishops; with many other refinements.  These English exiles readily embraced the Geneva system; and having added farther improvements of their own, upon Queen Mary’s death returned to England; where they preached up their own opinions; inveighing bitterly against Episcopacy, and all rites and ceremonies, however innocent and ancient in the Church:  building upon this foundation; to run as far as possible from Popery, even in the most minute and indifferent circumstances:  this faction, under the name of Puritan, became very turbulent, during the whole reign of Queen Elizabeth; and were always discouraged by that wise queen, as well as by her two successors.  However, their numbers, as well as their insolence and perverseness, so far increased, that soon after the death of King James the First, many instances of their petulancy and scurrility, are to be seen in their pamphlets, written for some years after; which was a trade they began in the days of Queen Elizabeth:  particularly with great rancour against the bishops, the habits, and the ceremonies:  Such were that scurrilous libel under the title of Martin Mar-prelate,[2] and several others.  And, although the Earl of Clarendon[3] tells us, that, until the year 1640, (as I remember) the kingdom was in a state of perfect peace and happiness, without the least appearance of thought or design toward making any alterations in religion or government; yet I have found, by often rummaging for old books in Little Britain and Duck-Lane, a great number of pamphlets printed from the year 1530[4] to 1640, full of as bold and impious railing expressions, against the lawful power of the Crown, and the order of bishops, as ever were uttered during the Rebellion, or the whole subsequent tyranny of that fanatic anarchy.  However, I find it manifest, that Puritanism did not erect itself into a new, separate species of religion, till some time after the Rebellion began.  For, in the latter times of King James the First, and the former part of his son, there were several Puritan bishops, and many Puritan private clergymen; while people went, as their inclinations led them, to hear preachers of each party in the parish churches.  For the Puritan clergy had received Episcopal orders as well as the rest.  But, soon after the Rebellion broke out, the term Puritan gradually dropped, and that of Presbyterian succeeded; which sect was, in two or three years, established in all its forms, by what they called an Ordinance of the Lords and Commons, without consulting the King; who was then at war against his rebels.  And, from this period the Church continued under persecution, till monarchy was restored in the year 1660.