Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 99, November 22, 1890 eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 43 pages of information about Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 99, November 22, 1890.

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 99, November 22, 1890 eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 43 pages of information about Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 99, November 22, 1890.

Of course there is nothing very new in the idea of a cripple loving a beautiful maiden, while the beautiful maiden bestows her affections on somebody else.  SHERIDAN KNOWLES’s Hunchback, Master Walter, is an exception to Hunchbacks generally, as he turns out to be the father, not the lover, of the leading lady.  It has remained for Mr. CARTON to give us in an original three-act play a deformed hero, who has to sacrifice love to duty, or, rather, to let self-abnegation triumph over the gratification of self.  This self-sacrificing part is admirably played by Mr. GEORGE ALEXANDER, whose simple make-up for the character is irreproachable.  That something more can still be made by him of the scene of his great temptation I feel sure, and if he does this he will have developed several full leaves from his already budding laurels, and, which is presently important, he will have added another 100 nights to the run.

[Illustration:  Mr. Punch applauding Master Walter George Desmarets.]

Maud (without the final “e”) capitally played by Miss MAUDE (with the final “E”) MILLETT. (Why didn’t the author choose another name when this character was cast to Miss MILLETT?  Not surely for the sake of someone saying, “Come into the garden”—­eh?  And the author has already indulged his pungent humour by giving “GeorgeAddis to “GEORGE” ALEXANDER.  Mistake.) This character of Maud is a sketch of an utterly odious girl,—­odious, that is, at home, but fascinating no doubt, away from the domestic circle.  Is a sketch of such a character worth the setting?  How one pities the future Bamfield menage, when the unfortunate idiot Bamfield, well represented by Mr. BEN WEBSTER, has married this flirting, flighty, sharp-tongued, selfish little girl.  To these two are given some good, light, and bright comedy scenes, recalling to the mind of the middle-aged playgoer the palmy days of what used to be known as the Robertsonian “Tea-cup-and-saucer Comedies,” with dialogue, scarcely fin de siecle perhaps, but pleasant to listen to, when spoken by Miss MAUDE MILLETT, MISS TERRY, and Mr. BEN WEBSTER.

[Illustration:  Dr. Latimer at the Steak.  Historical subject treated in Act II. of S. & S.]

In Miss MARION TERRY’s Helen, the elder of the Doctor’s daughters, we have a charming type, nor could Mr. NUTCOMBE GOULD’s Dr. Latimer be improved upon as an artistic performance where repose and perfectly natural demeanour give a certain coherence and solidity to the entire work.  Mr. YORKE STEPHENS as Mark Denzil is too heavy, and his manner conveys the impression that, at some time or other, he will commit a crime, such, perhaps, as stealing the money from the Doctor’s desk; or, when this danger is past and he hasn’t done it, his still darkening, melodramatic manner misleads the audience into supposing that in Act III, he will make away with his objectionable wife, possess himself of the

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 99, November 22, 1890 from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.